Is was talking about the TT, which you have quoted as well. Not about FOMO paywall vehicles.
1 Like
Amazing tech tree vehicles btw.
2 Likes
True, I forgot about the B7A2. The A6M6c was added to the game before I started playing it. So that’s two vehicles.
With all due respect, Japan has one of the biggest collections of TT planes at rank III and IV in the game. Even the US doesn’t have as many.
1 Like
they do, they got so many, that they actually started foldering the majority of them.
Even with the big nations there’s some odd gaps that can be filled (eg no rank 1 UK TD in the tree)
Not many that can go there tbh
Valentine AT wants to call you
Nobody claimed they were TT vehicles. Its been explained several times regarding WW2 vehicle placement.
Well, there are over 200 aircraft suggestions for Japan at the moment.
Weird if they couldnt pick a few out to implement.
1 Like
They aren’t putting a 6pdr in Rank I
And I explained to you what the focus for the tree has been:
I know, you say this all the time.
So does that mean WWII should be neglected?
Because Japan WWII TT has been neglected.
And you can talk about the BVVD Q&A, saying that the focus is top tier, but other nations receive WWII equipment for their TT. Yet, Japan does not.
Because I have answered you multiple times, but this same conversation from you seems to be raised every week at this point.
1 Like
Rank III Japan: 18 planes
Rank III US: 21 planes
Rank IV Japan: 15 planes
Rank IV US: 15 planes
Only counting TT, of course
That is hardly any difference
2 Likes
They put a 17 pdr at Rank II, so…
Is there a chance for a third line for the UK/Japan/France/Italy coastal tree?
Also any chance to return missing SB2M/SM.79/AR-2s?
Would Alecto II work?
Maybe.
A Gun Carrier based on the Universal Carrier would also be viable.
2 Likes
A third line would only be needed if there was sufficient vessels to place there. At the moment, none of those nations require it with their current vessel roster.