Correct, all CMs have said is that considerations will be done carefully. Not that it will or won’t be added.
My theory is that they will add the M1A2T and VT-4 (TH) at the same time as an attempt to defuse the argument
2 Likes
Or double the outrage…
2 Likes
I doubt the VT-4 is for internal testing. It was likely ordered as slight variation alongside the Norinco VT-4 to save costs, but the addition was delayed because the timing around V-J day was so bad. Now it’s sitting in the files to either be eventually removed or added, just like many other models have in the past.
I think “Internal Testing” was only the US T-90
Throw the US T-90A in there, lets do all the controversies at once.
Doubt it. Most M1A2T outrage was because people assumed TH VT-4 was cancelled by Chinese outrage. VT-4’s outrage was mostly bad timing.
1 Like
US might just be the internal testing ground nation. There is an American AMX-13/75 and AMX-13/90 in the files. I think it was part of an old event though, but it has no unique event tag (like _event, _race, _football, etc.)
1 Like
Yep, I think both were from World War Mode events where they were representing Israeli AMX-13s.
Found it!
ah ;-;
At the moment its not under active consideration, but a suggestion report can certainly be made.
1 Like
Hello Smin!
I know it’s a bit early, but is Community Update No.9 scheduled for the December update?
There will likely be one yes.
4 Likes
Thanks for the prompt reply!
I’ll make one if I have the time.
Are you enjoying the update?
Sent from my Hawk 200 RDA
yeah I know I asked about it 4 times but what is going on with the Q&A video 😭
The same answer as the previous 4 times im afriad. When its ready we will let eveyone know.
spice,ROC/TW will take it as a main meal
all ROC/TW future vehicles are spice
compared to m1a2t,I prefer idf,it is a independent vehicle
Just making sure it’s still being worked on
Hey. Generally the reports would be updated if so. But this is also unlikely outside of major update. As new weaponry options are normally added then.
Say Smin, quick question. is there any possibility that the U.S. Tech Tree might also get the Oplot-M in the future? Or even the Object 478 BEM-1?
Just considering the vehicle is still in active use by the U.S. Army (along with the Object 478BEM-1/2 that were specifically built for the U.S.), to me it would seem like there’s enough justification to add them. I mean they seem to be similar enough to what happened to to the Pakistani Oplot, though unlike said Oplot the U.S. still uses them.
1 Like
Hey. There is generally always a possibility of most things in some form perhaps some day unless we have already ruled something out. But as you can imagine, we cant go vehicle by vehicle confirming or denying or giving a yes / no.
So sadly its not possible to give answers on spesific vehicles in most cases.
about oplot,I’d rather have this one
2 Likes