Never realised how much low tier Thailand has
Community Manager post tomorrow??
1 Like
My bet Thursday
It seems they are even more copy paste than korean tree…
1 Like
If the requirement is a tree with 0 C&P. I guess we have all the TTs we are going to get.
But those options would add the greatest set of diversity and the fullest trees. Would a Korean tree even have enough options to meaningfully match Israel?
Whilst Poland tree doesn’t even have indigenous top BR tank and Iberian tree will be another Swedish tech tree with another Leopard 2, yes at least Korea has indigenous top BR ground vehicles and possible fighter.
Although I’m not hating Korea to be USA subtree, we already know that Korea will never be Japan’s subtree.
3 Likes
Add Turkey and insert SK there 😆
1 Like
On the other hand I hate wasting SK on being a sub tree, because you know we wouldn’t see most of their domestic stuff.
Just give me an Israel style small tree for SK or United Korea.
5 Likes
They could just manually twitch it a bit so that they get the current PL-12, and relabel them as SD-10, while the 13.7 ones gets PL-12 as a proper option. It should be a sort of 120C model without motor improvement. So not that big of a difference especially accounting the slower nature of Chinese airframes.
1 Like
Japan does actually have AIM-120C-5, even in service before the F-35, when the F-15 was the only Japanese aircraft capable of using them
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UcLa8mH7SZyC
It was rejected because Gaijin wanted only at the time top tier aircraft to get the new missile.
3 Likes
PT-16/17 is just T-72 with changed gun add on armor, and Anders is not an top BR thing.
If tanks that such as the K-1 can be considered unique even though they share a lot of of DNA with the XM-1, then why can’t the PT-17? Also the WPB Anders which has similar performance over all to the CV90120 and is not considered top tier capable?
5 Likes
While K-1 ‘shares’, PT-17 is just modified T-72. Never to be called ‘indigenous’
Also, though K-1 is originally designed by General Dynamics, concept of K-1 is very different from XM-1. It’s more of smaller but heavier armored Ariete.
*Uses a highly modified T-72 chassis with a new turret. Although the PT-17 might be of soviet descent it still uses mostly indigenous parts
6 Likes
Do you per chance have Ariete armor values or you are talking about in game ones?
in game ones
United tree(well have to be named Altaty/ XD) would be a good choice, but then US coastal doesn’t have any good candidate left for its subtree.
I’m naval main player so quite concerning about it. Loss of Israel was very bad news for US coastal.
The F-16 is over-performing because there’s no G-limiter.
War Thunder does not have a multiplier for AOA limits, meaning 9.2Gs on that video is to be 9.2 in-game, which it does pull.
The F-15 doesn’t have AOA limits and can easily pull 11Gs IRL which will deform its wings.
Not this week currently. Subject to change. (It may move depending on a few things, but I would rather be safe than disappoint).
21 Likes
