YES, this is what i expected
with its current performance its not better at least not better by much only real benefit it has over the other top IFVs is mobility
Oh please, it was proposed and shown a mockup saying that “Yes, we can do it, here is an example”. It more than enough justification for it, unlike a certain aircraft.
1 Like
Those are AMBER racks, they’ve only been mounted once on a single airframe. It does not mean they were integrated and capable of being employed. It was just a proposal from Boeing. Gaijin could add it but it’s quite unlikely.
I have used the Namers extensively and I can tell you that even the current Jaguar dev version is easily better than both.
1 Like
Thank you, i was searching for this image too lol
DEV server is open???
Yo sonar got added
2 Likes
Su-30SM has the dual R-77 racks centerline that are only used on the Su-35, so…
3 Likes
They added a fricking T-34 with a stab, what is a double standarts is that?
and they arent the only 11.3 light tanks you also have the HSTVL and LDT, Puma with Spikes
Spikes are bad though, it a damn tickle ATGM lol
Nothing confirms the Akeron won’t be the same
The vehicle should just get its 4 missiles period
4 Likes
Well chat Israeli player keep coping because no change to spyder
It’s not the same, gaijin has gone over this multiple times. They have different standards for incomplete prototype aircraft and production aircraft.
(Sorry for the quote ping sir gunjob)
There were no trials and usage, and it has not been proven to be integrated yet.
1 Like
and we have yet to see enough evidence to prove that the Akerons will be better
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Yeah never quite understood that. I ain’t into Russian tech, but my guess is it’s some kind of Russian bias exception or they have information suggesting it was done at some point. If it’s the latter it shouldn’t be a problem
