Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Was there maybe a report made to just update the ingame model to the 2006 model then? Id say that would be a good trade

Yes and no.

If nothing else, it needs fixing for SAMs, but It can be annoying at times, especially around 12.0, still get a lot hugging the deck, and climbing isnt always a smart play.

Ehem

Where hawk 200 blog/trailer

To make missiles more realistic, it’d have to be on a per-missile basis and not a standard blanket height like it is now. Also means we’d need more seekers.

The AGS…
Not even 400mm of KE pen but somehow in 12.0
M900, gaijin ?
And if not M900, at least a vaguely decent shell, like DM33 or DM63

Its a different vehicle technically so you could do the 2S6 type upgrade but if gaijin wanted that it would’ve happened by now, we have multiple CV90120 models that could be added with varying differences.

If they were to actually give each missile its proper seeker characteristics, MAYBE the 7M would actually make a difference to the 7F, and im all for it

image
spyder and merkava…

2 Likes

Yeah. Its especially obvious when every Fox-3 has the same seeker besides MICA iirc? Pretty much every missile is easy to notch besides MICA.

KF41 is not good, it’s playable, but Freccia is way better. Centauro I 120 is very different, actually imo it’s the 2nd best vehicle of the Italian top tier after 2A7HU.
KF41 suffers from fixed launchers position, very limited amount of missiles and poor survivability.

SEP and SEPv2 too lol

1 Like

Mostly like UHT around new missile helicopters…

Yeah the MICA has way more aggressive angle gating afaik

Nope of course

1 Like


2006 expo version^
Screenshot 2025-09-30 220712
Version in game which is based on the CV9040B chassis which lists the weight, its clear the one in game lacks all the add on armor additions.

1 Like

Year 2, still waiting for the DAMN TUSK to be removable on SEPv2…

1 Like

@Midakolol


the one in game uses the same chassis as the 1998 model here with a different turret

2 Likes

Please use english !

Use your native language in this part of the forums

I guess ZTZ99A and WZ1001E staying at a lower BR than top means they do not intend to fix their reloads (like VT4’s) nor add their missing spall liners, though…

1 Like

Spall Liner on Chinese Tanks? That’s impossible (some random Gaijin employer).

1 Like