Inert
1 Like
Thanks I forgot the word inert for a second there lmao
Sir thats not a Swif… nevermind.
1 Like
I wonder what tomorrow’s devblog will be
on a positive note, at least we get wingtip pylons on it
isnt there evidence of the IRST and Radar not being able to fit on the Yak-141 and it still got both?
1 Like
There is direct evidence that an IRST and naturally a radar was going to be fitted to Yak-141 had it carried on. But it was cancelled at the prototype stage. Hawk 200 wasn’t.
2 Likes
I also like this camo, add it to the swift…
1 Like
this has never been a requirement for a bug report
yes the HP difference is low, yes it is always extremely small but it is still an error, that is extremely easy to fix
should all marginal bug reports been thrown out? like the previously fixed ones about the Tiger Is armour being 2mm too thick or II’s being 1 degree out of angle? or the ~30m/s on the Conquerors APDS?
Should the BESA fire rate bug report be closed because an increased rate of fire on it will lead to no noticeable change?
Should all engine sound reports be closed because they lead to no performance change?
should .50 cal Ammunition count reports be closed because it’d lead to no noticeable performance change?
all make almost no performance difference in game, but are still kicking, implemented, and breathing
the margin of a benefit has never been a requirement for a bug report, except for the cases where getting the exact value is near impossible to achieve with absolute precision (almost always aircraft flight models),
it is even more confusing in this case as the same conversions have been happening for years, and introduces inaccuracy into the game.
i know about don’t shoot the messenger and all that, but it’s very frustrating, the game uses PS and we’re forced to use the lower Imperial HP measurements because they’re “close enough”? even though they’ve been fixing these issues for years?
2 Likes
Its not a requirement for a bug report, its something at the developers discretion.
Not all no, but many have been. Again, thats down to the developers to decide.
You know it will be peak
it most likely wont get them for balance I would assume
Both magazines are automatic, then? I thought not. So this is pretty good, even if you use the 2x3, you could still fire a short but quick burst. Or did I understand that wrong?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
while bad its still a massive buff over SARHs and It wont get them to keep them at the intended BR I would assume
You know the HAWK 200 has AMRAAMS
Hey Smin! Would airshow pictures of the ZH200 and the mock ups work to bug report weapons on a later Hawk 200? Or would airframe matches be needed?
A completely hypothetical question
its limited to 6xr77s max.