AJ168 ARM on the Jag and thats it. 100% fair vs AGM-88 on the F-111
ALARM would be too OP
No that would be NG as the NG has a C model and eqrly E model then models with and without changed wings, and models with and without IRST sensor. Gaijin would more than likely give sweden the worst model and give everyone else the actual E lol. Wouldn’t be the first time they tried doing that on sweden and wont be the last
1 Like
I still don’t see the “advancement” of the Mk2 (except for software maybe). Hardware-wise the Mk2 mixes GaN with GaAs transmitters instead of being full GaN like the Mk1. The only advantage of GaAs is the price, otherwise it’s inferior to GaN in every metric AFAIK. (And development-wise it’s closer to the ES-05 than to the other Captors)
RAHHHH remove early/late designations
Mk0 and Mk2 also have a greater gimball range than the Mk1. 90 vs 100 degrees
I’d also like to note that there’s always a possibility they introduce next-gen missiles in December alongside new platforms. They want to give every nation at least one top tier MAW equipped jet before adding IIR and this can easily be achieved in the same update. As for later gen ARH missiles I am not sure but if their seekers are kept the same they could just be added right now since range is not really a relevant metric against players that pay attention, MICA would still reign supreme.
given how this helicopter looks i would rather not have any FNF missiles for the uk as brimstones are of the table
2 Likes
Mk2 can simultaneously jam and search/track, the earlier ones can’t.
But that’s a thing of the mechanical mount, not the radar itself.
they will probably add more cruise missiles for other TTs. ig only kh59 is mentioned cus its already in the files.
It’s certainly confusing to see both you and Morvan type at the same time.
1 Like
French toptier lineup after getting Jaguar
10 Likes
Muahaha
Should have seen the naval thread when all but 1 person had this profile pic. Damn traitors have now changed it to others
1 Like
we can get JAGM-MR through the AH-64E similar to all gripens having MAVs
it used to be worse at one time there were 4-5 people all with the same PFP talking about british stuff
That still is a software limitation as every AESA can be programmed to do the same if it has enough computing and transmission power (that even is the key advantage of having many transceiver-modules → doing many things through their agility or in parallel).
Quite disappointing that the Cheyenne is looking to be another premium.
Would have fit well under the UH-1B and researching into the AH-64A.
6 Likes
I’m not sure about that since I’ve seen countries require newer radars in order to have the same feature.
Littorio, Vittorio Veneto, Clemenceau, and Jean Bart in one update?
Don’t know why, but that doesn’t feel right to me
would’ve been nice to see.