Im explaining whats required to please report it in the correct place: Community Bug Reporting System
This topic is not the place to report bugs.
To check if a specific issue is known with a vehicle, you can search on the CBR using the search function. If you do not see a forwarded report, then it is likely not known.
could you please bump this report just look at it and youll see why its very tiring waiting for a big bug to be fixed thanks :D
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/fsQsRgkWZkcc
Nonsense! Every US player comes ingrained with the knowledge of what subs are. Love those long sandwiches.
SUB ??? is it Uboat time ???
Elde 98 Mobility // Issues Community Bug Reporting System
Created, of course ill probably need to make a new one but given how its nearly impossible to play it on some maps i can only hope it doesn’t get the CV90 MK.IV treatment and just left on accepted for a year.
That’s 90% of the bug reports, heck a number are even longer than that.
Trust me, i waited 3 years for the Finnish Leo camos to be corrected. And nearly 6 years for the majority of swedish aircraft to get their respective corrections but trust me, their accepted, just gotta wait :_)
I have a feeling there won’t be until other nations get better equivalents as well. For example, AAM-4 being unnerfed or AAM-4B being added.
Seems like the AIM-120C-5 was just a token addition to give the impression that air got something new too.
yup, was mid game typing that (the life of a bomber main, the vautour have a ground spawn now btw… kill me). Thats what i meant.
Genuinely asking here, do we have any unclassified sources claiming the AIM-120C-5 is underperforming? I’d love to see it buffed, but I cannot find hard numbers or statements regarding how it was improved.
From what I’ve gathered from others, it should have:
Again, I’d like to see the 120C-5 be the improvement it should be, but we also have to PROVE that these things are true.
This does also highlight the issue with Gaijin’s bug report system. They can simply make up incorrect specs for classified vehicles/weapons and ignore best-guess work since it’s not “specific enough”. It’s kinda hard to prove something is incorrect if “proper” sources are classified.
They certainly need to come up with a better policy now we are in current era tech and thus getting sources for things is gunna be hard work
As these have been rather well reported so far, but denied because it didnt have leaked classified information
Hey @Smin1080p_WT ,sorry to bother you but I have a question.
Are bug reports region-specific or they can be reviewed by any manager via some sort of translator?
All reports can be handled by any teams.
Can I ask you to bump this report please?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1Ase7BQeB15a
It’s in russian, but can be easily understood even without any translation due to attached video. I guess it has something to do with DLSS 4 implementation into the engine
Was lowsmoke denied?
I believe it’s ignored, but not denied completely
Is there much of a difference?
I dont beleive things like editting whether a motor produces smoke or not would take the year or 2 since the report was submitted. As with many many bug reports. They might not be able to openly dismiss the sources, so instead the reports just get ignored
I mean, theres chance that they will implement that. Tbh theres still chance to implement denied things(bruh).
Also gaijin is has allergies against lowsmoke motors… already for long-long time
Yeah, for aircraft too.
My Harrier report is officially over a year old
I feel like it just got out of Gaijin’s control, they originally wanted this just for FA-18 since it sucks kinetically, a bit like R-77-1 for Su-30SM, but then cause too many people for no reason at all complained about F15E and EFs not having it, they decided that it was going to be added to those as well, and then they can’t actually make it good or else those will be OP. IF limited to FA-18 I have no issue of it being really good like R-77-1, but with EF and F-15E it really can’t be.
It was added to the F15E from the beginning. It was only added to the EF later after the complaints