See i didn’t care for the Churchill crocodile because of the trailer problem but the EldE is actually the worst offender for the trailer. Gaijin should be paying me to play that thing since I’ll drive 2 meters and womp, im on my side and dragging my trailer for half the match because it wont unflip itself.
Witch is sad because it need to be able to get to cap for ammo, but like literally can’t because of the mobility
Whats more crazy is irl its really good when it comes to getting up and moving but in game its one of the most poor implementations of a vehicle
Because this doesn’t work for fully unique vehicles, doesn’t allow for lineups and in some cases can be redundant since those nations usually have equivalent or equal vehicles anyways.
Of course you could have, for example, added the Swedish Centurions to Britain and their Leopards to Germany, but that would be completely skipping over unique Swedish vehicles and separate their vehicles across multiple trees, while not even offering as much to the nations that got those Swedish vehicles.
8 Likes
Imagine no SAV 48 & A-21 combo because some angry armchair purist saying, “I don’t want Swedish things in my tree mer mer mer”
6 Likes
the farther you go with the subtrees and new minor nations the less meaningful unique vehicles there are. Sure there are some cheaper, easier to make vehicles that are unique, but a lot of these minor nations people want added only have 1-0 proper domestic MBT’s or heavier IFV’s, or operational jet fighters and attackers, things that set apart the nations we have ingame from all the proposed ones.
if you throw a bunch of them together in a single tree to make it sustainable, or even add them in the first place, there may be a couple new unique things but for the most part it only serves to dilute and make battles more bland and uniform across all BR’s for all existing trees
Now they just gotta fix the
Speed 725ms → >850ms
Warhead weight is about 3× too small
Missile is too light currently 65kg should be >80kg
Add the correct model for the FB-10A
it looses speed excessively fast
Booster/sustainer is too weak to effectively reach a moving target ~10km
3 Likes
Why play the A21 when its 4.3 and the SAV is 3.7, besides Ju-88 supremacy. Still waiting for all the B18’s to get their CCRP
Besides SAV is mid, the LVKV 43 has hydraulic suspension and can dance after getting a kill.
The combo is very good for the 5 kill wagers (3 in RB), I can easily get a couple of kills in the SAV and hop into the A-21
I just play anything German or Russian for 10 kill wagers since they are the most braindead and skillless nations for the majority of ground imo.
Or just sealclub with 6.7 or 7.0 USA, M46 is a slept on tank amd i rarely see people play it sadly.
Plus the VERY long overdue spall liners for the MBTs and armor fixes.
China would be my 2nd favourite MBTs, but I refuse to play them as long as they remain so brutally artificially nerfed.
Czeckoslovakia has above 200, Poland around 180
3 Likes
That’s reminds me, I need to get the ST-A2 : )
I was going off of Tadmats total, but thanks for reinforcing my point.
1 Like
I don’t much care about the spall liners and find the evidence a bit iffy and inconclusive.
But the armor fix would be huge not to mention the gaping hole around the breach
And the VT4 being killable by a 20mm frontaly
1 Like
I didn’t care for the 6.7 Japanese tanks well, minus the type 60 and type 61, those were fun. Also the Type 75 SPH, best of the 6.x imo
Yeah there was a version with Romania which then got removed
I only want one of those and Id rather have the British version with a lot more loadout options