ARM’s are needed to combat 70km SAM’s
Im sorry, but you saying that made me imagine a literal bathtub with one
Ok now i cant stop laughing thanks for that
Hi, Smin, when will there be more detailed information on the new BR for the equipment?
p.s. Sorry for my terrible English :(
KD-88 is more like ASM-2 but have a seeker able to lock ground target.
1 Like
Hey. Once the devs have reviewed everything, we will share any updates to the proposals table.
so a thursday post
thank, we will happily expect it
Kind of hope mig29s will finally get their R73s
2 Likes
Here have my shameless plug
3 Likes
that was denied so often that I’d only see this possible if there a serious balance shift at thar BR or regarding R-60M entitely
Can’t wait for the FV101 devblog /jk
2 Likes
Inertial navigation system + GPS + radar altimeter + imaging infrared (final phase)
this badboy can fit so many guidance systems…
there is an even better variant of the kh31 with more range.
Come on I want me news on my lunch break :(
3 Likes
so boring…
so
T-84M — JP
MIG-29M — RU(pre)
F/A-18E — US
F/A-18F — UK
J-10B — CN
Sky Sabre — UK
VL MICA — FR
GRIFO — IT
S-350 — RU
AW249 — IT
2 Likes
Wherever you got this from its fake.
(Reading your messages again it looks like you just wanted some discussion, sorry.)
Only reliable source is still silent
S-350 and VL mica should tell you enough
As far as we know SAMP/T is confirmed for Italy and France
And the Buk M3 for Russia
J-10B is a sidegrade/downgrade in terms of WT so unlikely.
The rest idk
6 Likes
MICA is plausible but S-350 is a no go way too much range
At least that would be somewhat of an interesting jet, unlike the Super Hornet.
Not saying that you are wrong on the J10 ofc
only J-10B that should be added is the TVC prototype.
But if they add another J-10 to the TT it should atleast be the C variant
3 Likes