iirc it tries to solve an Aerodynamic problem with Thrust vectoring
which will work, partially, at the cost of sustained turnrate and energy retention
not even range apparently
Thrust vectoring? Actually?
if it’s what I think it is?.. if not then expect 500 comments flaming me for getting it wrong
1 Like
Can’t find it online.
It does have advanced fbw
the EX dosent have TVC
2 Likes
Well that’s one glorious failure then
How did they even manage to fumble so hard
the FBW will not change the areodynamics of the jet so you shouldnt expect the FM to be drastically different from other F-15s in WT
1 Like
I just want a good dogfighter without having to grind another tt
(Legacy is good, could be better)
but it’s Heavier so it’ll be slightly worse?
Pretty sure the structure was changed to be lighter
My memory might be failing me though
2 Likes
Are you certain?(I’m coping)
might be lighter compared to the F-15E
more thrust helps in sustained turnrate performance the question is if it has enough thrust to compensate for its weight
3 Likes
I think you just have to give up on dogfighting for top tier US.
3 Likes
helps with sustained, yes, but doesn’t help with Instant turnrate
Just have to wait on f22 ig
i think so as well
the US hyper specialized into BVR and did not hesitate to give up WVR performance for it (look at the F-15E)
meanwhile europe and russia have still been trying to keep some amount of WVR performance
1 Like
very certain
the USAF chose stealth over Manouvreability, unlike everyone else, when developing their next airframes 40 years ago
even tho having a stake in the MBB X-31 which was a german Supermanouverable testbed
1 Like
That would be weird and a first. Usually every variant of a vehicle is always heavier, can’t recall any later variant of a vehicle where it got lighter.