Plus the HAL Ajeet thats even faster… or mayve even the mk2 that was half built
Could be good at other tiers too with the different versions and varying BR’s.
I know one nation that has plenty irl, but still only a few in WT.
only one of those has flares or chaff
U don’t need them if u fly faster than IR missiles.
Applies to at least one of them.
i will commit a crime if they put the mig 31s as premiums
If they dont delete this comparaments mechanics in next update i should delete this game.
No way 94 % die with HP comparaments mechanics. And its not a bug or so… Developers did it.
No matter what ship will come in game or already is. All are same. All are just some black hp sections.
Without any matter of armour or construction of ship
If the front falls off i don’t think ot matters how many people are still alive in the tin can
2 Likes
This is both realistic and good for gameplay.
In a nutshell;
In real life, ships weren’t bombarded and survived till every single soul in the ship ceased existing. Ships were destroyed and sank when their hulls and systems had been irreversibly damaged.
Take Bismarck, for example. After 700 impacts over 2 hours of shelling from Battleships and Cruisers, the ship had long been entirely mission-killed; incapable of shooting back, maneuvering, and barely staying afloat… yet over 50% of the crew was still alive.
3 Likes
yea… very realistic that Destroer or Cruiser can kill every BB with some minutes. Cause armour have 0 value with this mechanics
The previous with the damaged plates was much better. When the plate was destroyed, more damage was dealed. It dealed. Its was 100% better…
Did they not fix that? If not, it’s a bug and was deemed like so. I recall seeing patch notes claiming it to be fixed.
16 Likes
I’m not sure. That mechanic made plates behave like ERA instead of 300mm thick, hundredmeter-long armor blocks. I recall 2-3 well placed salvos would “destroy” a plate and leave that area “naked”.
Regardless, this isn’t about how ships take damage; rather, how they are sunk. I think loss of buoyancy should be the primary factor, not crew sniping.
You nean the AAM-3 on F-4EJ KAI or something else?
Couse the EJ KAI one is a publick cnovlage and was just couse somebody is stupid
2 Likes
No
I have sended you todays IOWA ez kill screenshot.
I can send this from every battle.
So you find weird that a 1920s ship sunk after several of your Super-Heavy 16 inch shells tore apart its entire bow and stern?
The system may still require some polishing and be toned down, though, I will agree with that. But I don’t think the idea of shifting the primary damage concern from crew to buoyancy is bad.
3 Likes
Then what do you mean?
Tell me why yamato sunk faster than all others ?
Sadly, since this year and a bit before, when they added compartments, the game become worst.
There is no fun anymore.
1 Like