We know it’s not true because the F-2 is on there ;D
I think I worded something wrong along my tired rant. What i’m trying to say is most of my support for a US (if it can get one) sub tree lies with a south asian one. SK and The Philippines or one of the other, I don’t think Saudi Arabian vehicle should be added anytime soon I was trying to say if they get added they should go to the USA not that they should.
1 Like
Didn’t the devs confirm that MiG 25 is going to be a event jet?
1 Like
Hey maybe the sepV3 will finally have the DU armor lol
keep dreaming, gaijin is never going to give us a Abrams with proper armor
1 Like
lol you should see the amount of reports in the last week alone they’ve denied for the smallest reasons ignoring the important parts and only criticizing the smallest thing denying my reports due to stuff like the turret du already being added
These are stored at AMARG untill both of the governments manage to mend their relations
1 Like
I would take that, or the Badger or Warrior CT40
A Bmp 2/3 would be an upgrade.
Compared to the original Warrior it is an absolute bus. And the protection system states 70mm added protection which does nothing in game.
The 25mm APFSDS kills slower than any other high tier IFV. Its round wont go through the side of any high tier tank and if it does the spalling is so small.
TOW 2B is still underperforming, TOW 2A is fine and having 2 is nice.
No, addition Armor on Desert Warrior isn’t against KE, it’s against Soviet 73mm PG-9 HEAT
You can check in protection analysis.DW can stand against PG-9 in frontal and side.
1 Like
Meh, they should give SK to Japan they need each other
14 Likes
I don’t think they’re going to.
Yes. But.
R-27EA was never built, but R-27A was and was test fired extensively.
R-27A and R-27EA are different in the same way as the other 27 and 27E missiles, modular engine block. R-27A worked fine so you could have made R-27EA by simply attaching the A seeker onto R-27E and presumably tweaking some guidance values due to different shape and relative positions of control surfaces.
R-27EA was offered for export sales.
I don’t know if Gaijin considers that real enough, although there are a few things that are a lot less real currently in the game.
Doesn’t bother me, since I firmly believe this game will have to become significantly less picky to keep nations balanced.
It would be a great game for me if it implements paper projects in a realistic and plausible manner. I also think it’s the only way we’re going to have any interesting 5th and 6th gen planes.
1 Like
mig-25 top prem
Spoiler
They should add the Leopard 1NL or 1-V instead, 8.0 France is painful. Also the PRAT at 8.3 to combine.
Very fake
Honestly not bad if true.
AIM-120C-3 & AIM-120C-3 AMRAAM and I-Derby ER
Gaijin may add AIM-120C-5 AMRAAM model
But gaijin not ready AIM-120D, R-77M, PL-15/PL-15E, Astra Mk.1 & MK.2 and Meteor in 4 or 5 years
In fact R-77-1 better AIM-120C-5 but gaijin nerf R-77-1 same R-77
Other F-16C (USAF) before F-16C Block 50 and other MiG-29 before MiG-29SMT (9-19)
The early 4.5 gen fighter aircraft from PLAAF or PLANAF, and russian navy
First tranche and F.1 standard
Yeah both not early fire & forget AGM for attack helicopter
But SPIKE NLOS range longer AGM-179A JAGM
1 Like
lmao France is getting spit to the face this update if true, nothing new, just BRs going up.
Yeah thats fake no way Britain receive the Indian Su-30MKII
It’s too valuable to Russians as a premium or an event vehicle.
Gaijin has said India’s a British sub. Unless they go back on that and add in CANZAC instead.
1 Like