Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

This should be an event F.1
The actual F.1 that was in service should be in the tech tree

3 Likes

i want both. i know the prop meteor would be pretty mid as it doesn’t have the muscle to throw the airframe about but 4x nose hispanos does the lords work

I suppose Meteor NF Mk.11, Meteor NF Mk.12 and Meteor NF Mk.14 from RAF to researchable tree

BR 6.7 or 7.0 ?

Because Meteor F Mk.1 it’s the first jet fighter for RAF in world war 2

1 Like

Yep. I just don’t remember if the Soviet ones got any

The first event vehicle rank V for britain maybe Meteor F.1 Trent ?

Gajin might add Meteor 4 variants to regular tech tree and 1 variant to premium tree for great britain tech tree

Spoiler
  • Meteor F Mk 1
  • Meteor NF Mk.11
  • Meteor NF Mk.12
  • Meteor NF Mk.13 (RAF) (regular pack or the early squadron)
  • Meteor NF Mk.14
1 Like

Tho you actually need multiple Vehicles for ground matches, so it makes more sense to spam stuff there than air

would have to be 7.0. Jets any lower is a little unfair with British pilots

such C&P laziness isnt below gaijin was my point.

Israel didn’t have to be like this at all

1 Like

British tech tree lack 1st gen jet fighter aircraft 6.7 ~ 7.0

Meteor F Mk.1 for researchable tree

But, engine worse than Meteor F Mk.3 ?

Hello. Its not planned for the foreseeable future (certainly not the next update).

Its intentionally not active and this would also drastically alter the BR of the vehicle, since it was spesifically sold and introduced without ASMs. As such, its not a bug.

1 Like

Please see my previous response:

That was never in dispute :)

Not at all. Just a 7th or 8th is not really needed currently in an already very well populated Rank V.

The FR.9 and NF benefit Israel more than Britian currently.

Neither the NF.11 or FR.9 would fill these gaps. The F.3 represents the early Meteors well.

Every tree is potentially lacking a variant of an aircraft it may already have multiple off. Sadly not every single one of them can make it. At least for now anyway.

A lot worse, which is why it would work at 6.7
1,600 lbf with 180 hours of flight time before an overhaul was required or 1,984 lbf with a 20 hour flight time. So 725kgf compared to 910kgf of the F.3

So having several makes perfect sense and isnt a way to validate c&p to another tree :)

1 Like

And they do indeed have several. 6 in total currently. Whilst we haven’t ruled out any more entirely, there is no need for any currently at this moment in time.

@Smin1080p_WT could you take an quick look at this report? The EF has some serius Issues with its IFF in SB
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/rS5QyleqjTcD

1 Like

Ok good, had me worried there for a bit

so its another air focused update?