Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

In Bluewater Fleet, there’s almost no premium ships — especially not good ones. For some reason, they removed the solid Prinz Eugen from the German tree but left the underwhelming Nassau. Makes no sense.

And let me repeat: even with a premium account, the progression is still slow and boring.

Then CAPTOR-E on the German, Spanish, Kuwait and Qatar typhoons then. Rafale has HMD and 8x MICA from prototypes and the Su-30/34 has a mockup weapon that never existed. Captor-e for the typhoon would not be unreasonable given their refusal to add CAPTOR-M

That’s still 21 years behind. Maybe 22 since it does take them a bit to go operational.

Yes, with how missiles are progressing i think it’s been overdue for the EFT to get a radar that lets it act as sort of a mini-AWACS.

1 Like

That’s still much much later. And they don’t seem to like adding prototype only equipment for non-french top tier.

No ff’ing way should IJN get one more ship until USN gets North Carolina

https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/us-navy-ships/battleships/north-carolina-bb-55.html

1 Like

Oh, and nerf the IJN 410mm reload rates by 100% too …

And soviets

But perhaps, in any case, I don’t have issue with CAPTOR-M, but we don’t have it modeled at the moment, we have GOLDFISH-M at the moment and I’d rather they just replace it with a C&P of Blue Vixen or Foxhunter because both are better radars

1 Like

Just give us P-Track already Gaijin, and apparently the F-16A MLU and AM should have some sort of P-Track that gives faster updates on the selected target(so 1 not 6 but still), so it’s 2 birds with 1 stone.

1 Like

Will gaijin give us bigger maps for grb? or add a gamemode where is logistics is included? like u could have entire divisions and plan strategy?

just play arma 3 atp

You’re starting to get it now.

So is the AN/APG-71. It’s because these are the peak of Mechanical Radar design. However, saying AESA isn’t a necessity in today’s modern combat is crazy.

I don’t know the full extent of what is and isn’t classified on the Su-30 and Su-27, but I know that the FM in game, regardless of what has been published, is incorrect, and remains incorrect.

Just because your FM can’t be fully deciphered without classified docs doesn’t mean those with more public documentation are being represented properly as well.

iirc the 7th and 8th amraam cant be mounted irl due to landing gear restrictions

Not that I’ve ever seen and we have images of Marte-ER on those pylons which are far larger iirc (though would have to double check that)

As I said in isolated skirmishes sure having an AESA with no command and control/support assets absolutely. But in combat now it’s the EAWACS airframes that are providing DL and targets.
In the likely INDOPACIFIC theatre Aircraft/land based Radars and Surface fleets will provide DL

Yes and with drones you can use a F-35 or J-20 AESA as an additional EAWACS airframe.

Honestly I dislike all mechanical radars now after having played the Kfir C.10 and Rafale. Like I don’t know, it just feels so handicapped/limited.

It’s more frustrating having to cycle 3 different modes to try and lock something infront of you

1 Like
This has genuinely ruined my day. 50/50 between this and the Tandem MAI. (I don't even play US Naval)

image
image

Sick thing is I legitimately called it back on the day the BP was announced. This is just some sick cruel joke by Gaijin.

If Gaijin wants to keep making the BP worse and worse with each one they could atleast let us choose the crate reward.

3 Likes