Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Game Discussion General Discussion
8320

It’s not designed for the purpose at all its designed to shoot down drones, missiles that enter its envelope.
Its ASRAAM mounted to a truck with no Radar and from what we can guess a IRST system it could just be completely in LOAL mode.

In game by the time you shoot at the Su-30/34 their payloads will have dropped. Which offers no real improvement over what Britain has in game.
ITO-90 and Pantsirs main party trick is destroying missiles and bombs.

CAMM has DL and an actual system which would be far better it has a Radar and IR seeker like some versions of the IRIS-T

Yes when and if Jets get close rippling off 5 ASRAAMs is going to be a very bad day.

8321

As they’re radar guided they could be multipathed. I see that as a marginal issue. The agility is still good and range is undoubtedly the highest of the proposed missiles for the next update.

8322

If you mean Raven it works both in LOBL and LOAL

Huh? CAMM has RF only.

1 Like
8323

Wheya Dafuq are the ground vehicles?

Just the proto Lec and BMD-2 (nice) ?
If you are unable to include modern non-SPAA ground vehicles, atleast introduce the long time missing WW2 and early Cold War vehicles!

I know, its just random list, fake-able … but in recent times these do come true!

1 Like
8324

And funny the Supacat-ASRAAM meant for Ukraine just got its official name: Raven Short Range Air Defence System

3 Likes
8325

Is CAMM only Radar i thought like IRIS-T SL it had dual seeker modes. Thats good to know

And for Raven/Supacat is it just an IRST sensor for ASRAAM?

8326

What? SL does not have a dual seeker?
Only SLX.

Raven omly has a sight/IRT.

8327

Yes SLX thats the one. I was conflating it with the SL

Do we know expected detection lock ranges?

8328

Of what?
ASRAAM? CAMM? SLS? SLM? SLX?

8329

The Raven system

8330

The same as ASRAAM, so according to the current data, up to 15 miles.

2 Likes
8331

Oh god, didnt even think about that.

Well, if there was ever a time to remove MP, I guess its now

8332

MP won’t be that much of a issue to it. Not only is the missile a modern one, but it also uses a 2 way DL with the whole system, so the search radar and E/O would correct the missile.

8333

Providing Gaijin doesnt make it so the missile ignores DL when it goes active like they do with ARH missiles in the air.

Especially with SL-AMRAAM firing Aim-120Bs

8334

CAMM has 2 way datalink. SLAMRAAM does not.

1 Like
8335

So that might mean CAMM is fine, but does mean defeating SLAMRAAMs will be trivial

8336

but CAMN is still based on a smaller missile, so ALAMRAAM could performance better in longer distance.
and 1 way DL is enough for game use

8337

It’s a fake list don’t worry. We can all forget about this sad list.

1 Like
8338

Going by the suggestion

The base AMRAAMs would only be about 15km. The base CAMM has a range of 25km (with some docs partially indicating a range potentially greater than that)

8339

it’s the max range, just mean the missile can actually get there. but I doubt its actual energy level.
it’s like you change VT-1’s self destruction range to 20km in game, then it can reach 20km, but hardly able to hit anything.
SL-AMRAAM is a old system after all, modern tech allows missile’s battery last longer, and better ballistic planning(saves energy but this isn’t modeled in game)