how I perform on Seversk-13 is up entirely to luck. managed to snag 3 kills in the Obj 292 on that one flank by C only because I got incredibly lucky.
after that we were in their spawn and the game was over in 5 minutes.
Regenerative steering when?
Exactly lol
it’s like they track how active you are in each map or how you perform, and then throw the ones you perform the worst on at you.
although I will say the map rotations last weekend weren’t awful. played for 2 hours at a time and didn’t get the same map 50 times in a row.
Don’t get me wrong, i still got the same 5 maps, but i’ll take what I can get.
1 Like
Too advanced, we need to define traction first.
Will dig up a physics book and send it to the devs. (Entire 600 pages)
3 Likes
Make sure those physics books are declassified first
3 Likes
If we’re doing that, let’s find ground samples of each region the maps are based on too so we can figure out how soft or hard the ground is, and then calculate if the tanks will get bogged down if the ground is too soft.
I just hate C. B is a travesty of corner camping. Normally just stick to A and pray the team is vaguely competent for once and can mange to take B or C.
I just really don’t like city maps, give me sands of Sinai any day of the week, Hell I’d take Carpathians over any city map, even with the hellscape that is F6:G7 (please snail just flatten the ridge at G6 so you can’t “spawn” camp)
Can’t do that, as that’d would be like forging documents
We need to hire some actual scientists to do that for us and then have them publish the results
1 Like
C is the only spot I half know how to play lol
Just have to hope the enemies are oblivious, can’t aim, and don’t have armor when going on that flank
Not like you can climb that now lol, too little traction.
Ah yes, let me go find government surveys real quick, they can’t claim those aren’t credible sources
(even though they’ll do just that lmao)
1 Like
You know what my least favourite thing about Seversk-13 is?
The fact that half of the amphibious tanks cannot get out of the river because the stairs leading out of it don’t extend far enough into the river and have no ground in front of them, so it’s like trying to climb a small wall
Ggg-guysh, weHavE ReAListiQ GaeM, trUSht!
2 Likes
it’s sooooo realistic lmao
(/s for those of you too oblivious to realize I’m being sarcastic)
1 Like
They can fix an AIM-7P, but god FORBID they fix something that even f2ps can enjoy.
1 Like
“F-2 is too powerfull to add right now we will wait till other gen 6 fighters are added of similar tech”
11 Likes
Big FPS drop with AMD ray tracing enabled
The early 4th gen targeting pod for F/A-18C late & Rafale C when ?
AIM-120C AMRAAM series when ?
God please no, everything that isn’t the newest addition is being powercrept to hell and back, I’d prefer it if they focus their hype train onto actual fixes for older stuff and decompression.
1 Like
The Rafale doesn’t need a better TPod, it already gets gen 3 thermals ingame
There is no need for better AMRAAMs as it stands and only adding baseline AIM-120Cs would be pretty pointless as the changes between the B and C variant were mostly irrelevant for War Thunder up until the C-5