Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Game Discussion General Discussion
8198

Yeah, I get that. Personally I think a trailer feature goes a long way, as do unique and new mechanics.

For example F-2 could’ve brought the first AESA, with the J/APG-1 generally not being as impressive as later ones and the F-2 initially only carrying SARH missiles making it still balanced.
But since they missed that opportunity we just have to hope for something else, maybe the J/ARG-1 datalink or the ME/DY modes for flight control (and hope they’re not further overshadowed by TVC and Maneuver mode).

6 Likes
8199

I think Japan should only get the F-2 = says the guy who only played one Japanese vehicle via the BP lmao

8200

Screenshot_20250509_173751_Chrome
Screenshot_20250509_173751_Chrome1080×2400 650 KB

Nah clearly theres sooo little US stuff in game

4 Likes
8201

You don’t understand, the US only received 3 F-18s last update.

4 Likes
8202

Ikr soo little for the US, hmm lets have a look at other tech trees that clearly have soo much more

8203

I don’t think some nations should just stop receiving stuff until others can catch up but I think it would be better if they instead got some gap fillers or similar stuff that doesn’t push the boundaries whilst other nations catch up to them.

Like for the US instead of getting something more advanced they could get something like the A-4M, F-14D, F-16D, F-15D, F/A-18B/D. These would still be higher-top tier but wouldn’t be pushing the boundaries further than it already is whilst giving other nations a chance to get to the same point. (There’s more that could come obviously but just those as examples)

2 Likes
8204

Like I’ve said it doesn’t help he’s hasn’t played Japan at all even that one tech is from the BP.
Ngl why should we listen to a person who have yet to play that nation. I’m currently researching the Japanese F-15 while he’s haven’t even got the F1M2.

4 Likes
8205

Nooooo note the pete

8206

absolutely

why?

1 Like
8207

and it does literally every update, stop pretending like its so left behind

4 Likes
8208

“Please sir may I some more” after getting their Hornets and now asking for more tech. Then moans it’s always US vs USSR xD

2 Likes
8209

he was demanding that if the EFTs got SPEAR 3 so we had a GPS glide bomb the US MUST get GBU-53 so we ask for a counter part to SDB-1 and his response is America need even more advanced bombs just because we want a capability most US planes get

3 Likes
8210

It’s a small cruise missile, not a glide bomb, whole different class of weapons from the SDB 1

Technically speaking Israeli SPICE 250 ER is the closest thing to SPEAR 3

8211

Well that what you get for a player who top 100 most played tech is US baring 13 lol

2 Likes
8213

That would be the f2 early and i think we might have a chance to get it
It would be 13.0 with aam 3 and aim 7
Same kit as the f15j but on a lighter airframe

1 Like
8214

you say that, but that isnt true at all, the GBU39 has an operational range of 140km which funny enough is the operational range of SPEAR 3 literally all this means is SPEAR 3 will arrive slightly faster “ohhhh noooo its the end of the world for the US”

not to mention the GBU53 can be IR so it would be far more OP then the SPEAR 3

8215

Because 2-seaters look cool and would be good filler aircraft to add without pushing the game further in advancements

1 Like
8216

But it is still a “Paper Design” :) so it cant come to WT

8217

I’m sure they will find a brochure to use as a reason to add it

6 Likes
8218

Wasn’t there a document saying the RN was looking at the F-22 : P