Ground vehicles can still come even if 5 lines there just need to be a space in the tech tree like how the Dutch Leo’s came.
Folders exist, and with all the similarities between US and SK armed forces a good chunk of SK stuff could fit in them, if they weren’t largely identical to the US operated version in which case an instantly unlocked SK skin for whatever US vehicle it is would work fine
I think they could put K1 and K2 in the Marine Corps tank line since that line is dead (USMC retired their tanks lol)
3 Likes
There 's some UI related to it in WT Mobile, but afaik it 's unused there. Maybe it comes or maybe it doesn’t.
I don’t know abt " everyone ", but it seems possible that the PzH 2KA1(ITA) and VT-5 Uparmoured might be in it - the visual models for them have already been added to the files:
Devblog of WT Mobile:
The centerline RUR-5 ASROC is hidden, same as has been done w/ the JMSDF ships which mounted it. The refit is specified as the later one w/ the 127mm wing turrets.
Devblog of Aces:
3 Likes
I don’t think the US needs any sub trees yet. What they do need however, is their ATGM’s and IFV’s to fill those gaps at the higher BR’s. I don’t know how we have yet to get any of the other Strykers or LAV’s with all the ATGM’s, and what not. There is a pretty small advantage to having tank destroyer vehicles in a lineup, being spawn point cost, and the US has a big gap between 7.0-8.3, and nothing beyond that.
2 Likes
LMAOOOOOO…
@BACKRAGE44428 if would highly recommend you looking into both North- and South Korea.
You would notice that they have a lot of unique vehicles.
1 Like
BTW, where is the Dutch PZH2000??
1 Like
In the Netherlands maybe. It hasn’t been found in WT.
German air 100% needs a subtree sooner than later. Theres currently two additions left for it: A T4 Eurofighter and Tornado IDS SLE. And Switzerland alone (should they actually come) can’t fill that gap by itself either, they only have (looking at jets specifically) three additions.
1 Like
Nah, israel, Italy and china need one first.
Then an expansion of Sweden, Japan, France and Italy
2 Likes
Israel and Sweden are in a similar position currently yes. China still has quite a bit more to add. Japan just got a subtree, but even then they have little left. Don’t know enough about Italian/Hungarian AF equipment. France is in a similar boat, but they also just got a subtree
I don’t care what you add next update…Can Britain please have a top tier light tank…
Please Gaijin
The Desert Warrior is terrible at it’s own BR, it’s unplayable when you take it up to higher BRs.
It has everything you wouldn’t want on a light tank IFV
Incredibly slow = Cant flank or get into scouting positions
terrible optics = x2ish main gun zoom and commander optics no thermals and tiny zoom
terrible fire power = 25mm Bushmaster struggles with everything including helis (also doesn’t get the upgraded round the US ones have…) Why is that?
When many nations have rounds they never used “cough” DM63 for the Xm800t!
Tow 2B is still really bad and the A is fine but you expose the whole tank and die before the missile gets there as your role has to be slow support vehicle and not scouting light tank you don’t have the armour to back up your incredible bulk!
It’s just a miserable experience at any BR
isnt it just as fast as the Bradly??? it can hit almost 80km/h in both forward and reverse assuming its the same as the standard warrior
I do agree that we need a better light tank, Ares Overwatch would make a fun TD for top tier, light tank is either the Ajax or the CTA-40 Boxer
Its maxes out at 50kph on reasonable straights, the maps aren’t big enough for it to ever reach it’s top speed and it takes months to get there, it doesn’t turn well
Honestly it’s only saving grace is the stab, But they way you are forced to play. It’s barely better than then 8.3 Warrior
The Japanese still have a lot of things to add. Unfortunately, most of them are on Br. below 9. Fortunately, Thailand offers vehicles above.
2 Likes
I would like the UK to get Star Destroyers in the tree.
Firstly, the accents are British as Lucas modelled it off the Empire (even Tarkin Doctrine steps from the 2-Power Standard) .
Secondly, the ISD is rumoured to be inspired by the British KGV class in accordance with the prior British Empire theme (though it takes a lot from many ship’s i’m just choosing this point because the KGV’s are peak).
Some similarities are the turbolaser batteries and reference to 5.25" ones, KGV’s external belt is reflected in star wars lore on the more heavily armoured ISD’s, the deflector shields high up on the mast similar to the location of the radars on KGV, also notice the bridge is shapes like the upper half of the superstructure and slopes similarly to the KGV’s turret sides all sloping to the Queen Annes mansion.
5 Likes
soo… yeap we are closer and closer to the start of the dev season.