with 1950’s Iowa and Vanguard class
The last nation that needs any new capital ships is japan rn ngl, if anything they need a break
Nah, not really.
Japan sucks untill 7.0, only getting mediocre ships.
The top ships around these br’s still have to be added to the game.
Yamato and Musashi would be a very much needed and welcome gift after all that sh*t before top tier naval.
What are you talking about? Japan is pretty strong throughout the entire naval tree
great, so by same logic can USA get Mk23 shell on Iowa class bc of all the barbette suffering
What do you think yourself??
Japanese DDs
against Murican 2.8s(ace crew) reloading SAP slingers with anti fragmentation armor wich cant be pened with Japanes HE shells.
So yeah up to 4.0 Japan is enjoable but then only from 6.7-7.0 its playable again.
anything between there is outclassed by the other nations (except a few of ships)
wdym
so use SAP or AP
What, like the entire heavy cruiser line that works fine at the brs they are at, you get the same guns as those US destroyers at 4.0, and you have 2 of the most powerful ships in the entire game at top tier, yeah no japan doesn’t suffer at all
MK23 nuclear shells.
What do you think yourself?
Thats no comparison.
Japanese dds with the ww2 guns dont have any
rare moment of naval players discussing in R&R
1 Like
Gaijin wont give that to Japan.
And the bug reports on these shells have been open for years.
because yamato with the NC, KGV, and Bismarck is reasonable according to you right?
i think mk23 with biggest battleship ever is as reasonable as said battleship with NC, KGV, and Bismarck
what naval is real : O
1 Like
…
Like… what do you want me to say?
The Iowa, Yamato, KGV, Bismarck are the same level…
Why would the US get nuclear shells?
Just to be better than everyone else?
And give an explanation to how this would be implemented.
1 Like
yamato and Iowa are the closest 2 on that list, and yamato still has guns and armor on it. British counterpart is the Vanguard class, and Germans just dont have one.
the capital ship counter to a slow, heavily armed, extremely well armored battleship is an aircraft carrier or a very fast, insanely well armed (bc Mk23), decently armored battleship.
it would be implemented as a shell that Iowa can only carry 10 of
Thats one of the more recent additions (Murasame you mean?) but the classic Japanese WW II DDs struggle since they have a hard time dealing with the Anti fragmentation armor and in returned they have no armor and will be turned into swiss cheese from the 40mm AAs.
I didnt say we suffer at top tier, just in the middle field i find it a bit lacking compared to other nations.
A lot of problems could be solved by decompression like always.
Funny isnt it.
When its about air or ground, you would say: they didnt make any, thus have a gap.
Yet when it comes to the US, and now naval, you are:
So ironic… isnt it.