I just wanting gaijin to add the Il-28 since the Fins had one
why not 13.0
cause it be same BR as B tomcat which wouldnt make sense
So basically… it would just be what the B should have to begin with? Besides the radar and irst. It would literally just get most of the things the B should have in the first place :/ and i doubt we get the aim54c ECCM
i could list a few planes that should be 13.3
SU33
F15a
SU27
yeah i gave up fighting gaijin on the B tomcat they hate it so nothing we can do
F-14D will basically be like what a 13.0 4th gen should be
1 Like
F14B could easily be 12.7 people complain a bit to much
I mean their picture of Finland having a sizable fleet of IL-28.
NH-1
NH-2
NH-3
NH-4 (With NH-2 at the back)
Im not sure how useful would IL-28 be either in ARB or CAS, but having a huge bomb sometimes could be fun, who knows
F4F ICE and F3 Late as well
Would add to the 8.x air section
1 Like
Yeah, sometimes stuff is just inevitable for gameplay, especially with some of the tanks. I mainly mean stuff like one nation using different HE shells or getting an APCR or something.
Yeah true, even the “main” variants often are just thrown together from different ones.
3 Likes
they seem to do it to reject bug reports they dont like and make their own version of it. they didnt do it for the Rafale since they gave it a specific version, and now its possibly the best jet in the game. Not really mad about it but i do hope this happens for other stuff
1 Like
When will Bismarck or Tirpitz be added? Why do other nations already have ships like Colorado-42y, Nagato, Kongo-45y, Warspite-42y, and Rodney-40y versions — all equal to or better than Bismarck — while Germany still doesn’t get a proper top-tier battleship? The Germans weren’t able to build large ships, and theirs were comparable to what other countries built after the Great War and before the Washington Naval Treaty. But they aren’t Iowa, Yamato, or other post-treaty titans either — and Bismarck isn’t a match for those either.
Why do the Germans always get top-tier vehicles much later? Why were the Germans stuck with the MiG-29G in aircraft while their opponents already had the Su-27?
And don’t bring up the Scharnhorst — it was added a long time ago, and it’s not the Bismarck.
How much longer do we have to wait already???
1 Like
Hello @Smin1080p_WT
i found a report from 2 years ago with the status accepted but nothing happened since there. Can you maybe look at this? This Report make a huge difference when added.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/S7NgwHbZSa35
1 Like
This year
“Q: Are there any plans to implement naval for China, Sweden and Israel in 2025?
A: No, in 2025 we plan to focus on the logical completion of Bluewater fleet trees by adding the most famous and powerful battleships. In parallel, we’ll work on the implementation of other types of ships and weapons that are not yet presented in War Thunder.” - CM Covert Disclosures No.4: Information & Q&A with War Thunder Game Director, Viacheslav Bulannikov!
1 Like
Giaijin language = It’s doing very well therefore no need too add more powerful ships
lol
you want Bismarck, it can come with North Carolina class, and KGV class
1 Like