MLU1 didn’t come out it is a Pre MLU program F/A-18.
1 Like
You should really read what people say.
The Finnish F-18C (in the Swedish tree) has all of its historically accurate weaponary. The additional weaponary came with later MLU variants, which are separate and as mentioned a couple of times now, are planned to come later.
As I mentioned, if you think something is inaccurate about it or incorrect, you can report that with the evidence to show what’s wrong.
3 Likes
We are not remotely close to dev season if that’s what your asking
2 Likes
What do you mean he is saying the F/A-18 Finnish is an MLU1 it is not.
2 Likes
HMS habakuk, you done need aircraft carrier mechanics, with her sheer size you can just sink them by ramming
1 Like
Smin, kick the developers, they still haven’t fixed the camouflage bug on the Leo 2A4M, although the bug report was accepted 3 months ago. Please
Spoiler
Israel Indian subtree when
1 Like
It isn’t happening
Not happening when India is already British subtree
It can and should change. It can change because Israel used to be in USA, Italy used to be in Germany and France used to be in Britain, it’s far from too late. It should because Indian vehicles have nothing to do in the British tree, these nations have hardly anything in common, British mains clearly don’t want the Indian subtree, and said subtree is very limited in Britain, both in amount and style
Also, Israel needs a subtree more than anyone, while Britain still lacks a lot of indigenous vehicles and hardly needs a subtree like India
Dev season no, but new BP season soonTM? ^^
1 Like
They become independent tree, not another subtree.
You’re ignoring Indian armed forces of 60s and 70s it seems.
Well, I constantly see ‘give Britain Indian Rafale and Su-30’ in here. Did I see ghost? Besides, as naval player, I also want Indian naval in British tree too
An Indian sub nation is already here, it’s within Britain.
Why ?, because the dev’s called our MBT’s niche.
1 Like
I wish, but I’m unsure they’ll consider the content to be enough for a standalone tree
I very well know, I’ve done a ton of research on Indian equipment. Simply, there’s also too much unique stuff that isn’t compatible with Britain
I also saw these people but I really don’t think that’s a good idea for Britain. They need their indigenous stuff, they need their harriers fixed, they need their mbts fixed, not Indian stuff. And I’m not a naval player but something I know is Britain has been the world’s number one navy for a long time and I’m guessing they have more than enough for your navy tree
India is a sub tree already in the British tree. There are no plans for it to be in Israel too.
1 Like
These are cases of a sub tree becoming a full nation tree.
As we have already explained, India does not have enough vehicles by itself (without also then needing multiple sub trees of its own, and even then) to have a standalone tree.
1 Like
Wait so in rare cases, sub nations can became an independent nation ?
I thought nations post SA they can only be subs when they were announced and could’t move.
In very old days France and Italy was subtree of Great Britain and Germany.
And I think maybe Israel was originally planned as subtree of USA as two Merkavas were on US tech tree?
Not any of the sub trees announced since South Africa. All of those were added as sub trees precisely because they can’t be full standalone nations.
I was referring to the original nations that were a “sub tree nation” inside of the original nations in game.
Italy was in Germany
France was in the British tree
Isreal was in the American tree
1 Like