If there is evidence to support that, then it can be reported and passed for consideration.
If a need for an earlier Tornado to be split off arises, then it can be reconsidered at that time. But for the current aircraft, it is as it is intended.
i’d buy that premium in an instant
But we can’t report the Tornado Gr1 having the incorrect engines based upon the timeframe of its current loadout, but we can report the Tornado IDS (early) having a choice between 2 different engines?
Mk103 isnt incorrect, they were ALL upgraded at the same time, but that having been said, the idea why Britain is being artificially nerfed is entirely and completely contradicted by the fact the IDS early gets the better engine
As would I. Im fed up of having to deal with the 11.7 BR when it should be 11.3 and as Britain has no top tier GRB line-up having one for 10.0 for the 10.X GRB line-up would be fun
1 Like
i’d just buy it for a tonka related title and owning the world best looking plane and at a lower br
It already has been and has already been answered by the developers.
Yes. As this has not yet been reported and answered unlike the GR.1.
Well… Looks like I know what dev thread post I will be making next major update to challenge this clearly stupid and biased decision to artificially nerf Britain
1 Like
yeah well while you do that, ill create more aim 4 falcon propaganda to get people really hyped, gaijin sees it and decides to finally stop being silly and add it and then its comes to the game in a poor state bc its not an amazing missile and then theres more complaints
theres only 1 flaw
no one cares about the aim 4 falcon but me and a few other lunatics apparently
To be fair i didn’t think it would, its hard to try and matxh the models in game for Finland as they are missing a lot of items that gaijin removed for the versions in game so theres no specific weight that isnt just the general weight of the Soviet models. I literally have no idea what version they copied or amalgamized for the one in game as there are Finnish T34s with and without the parts misisng or present in game.
a source is a source
Not entirely, they can be very picky at times.
Yeah well its not like the Swedish Ministry of Defence thingy is exactly wikipedia
They prolly got the data from finland tbh
I lied, the source is… the matrix?
Spoiler
The numbers mason what do they mean.
See i cant just use any source as some Finnish T-34’s were using BT chassis’ as skirts as listed by a engineer but ive never seen any images of it. Though given the BT’s were essentially used for add on armor for the Sturmi’s and other Finnish vehicles it doesn’t suprise me.
3 Likes
im asking around for the data on what those sources are
Appreciate it, see i could’ve spent my time in Finland 2 months ago seeing the Parola Musuem but instead wasted it with some Family members. Should’ve been focusing on bug reports for the snail lol.
Ill eventually go back for Museums in my free time.
Currently everyone can play and enjoy them in War Thunder during the event.
Everyone can also obtain the H.P.12 during the event to keep.
As we have already announced, a key feature of Aces of Thunder will be WW1 aircraft: Gaijin Entertainment expands Aces of Thunder with legendary World War I aircraft - Gaijin Entertainment
this is smin so idk i feel we wont get them for a long time
I’ll confirm in the morning but this sheet
Spoiler
Seems to suggest the source they used is russian itself
1 Like
Yeah sources are entirely up in the air I believe
Classified thus it’s just a secondary source
@Smin1080p_WT Hi Smin, looking at WT Mobile, could you tell me if there are plans, at least for this year, to add Type 42 destroyers in War Thunder?
If they wanted us to know that they have plans to add specific vehicles, they would tell us on the official news channels.