False advertising as I understand it would have only mattered if gaijin made any money of the sale of infantry combat.
If they had been upselling the idea of turning war thunder into an FPS for months or had sold specific infantry based content and then never followed through on it, then it mgiht be considered false advertising.
in this regard there is reasonable expectation that it wasnt real and there has been no such upselling of the game or products through the use of what is more than likely an april fool joke .
I strongly doubt Gaijin or any other game could actually genuinely be sued for false advertisement over this and only maybe in the US. Here in Europe, they probably wouldnt be.
The only time Gaijin had a chance of being sued was when the Italian M60 was advertised with a stabilizer, but they removed it from sale before removing the stabilizer.
no they are doing false advertising implicating the game development with false promises this could mislead many people to buy items from their game (GE, Gaijin Coins, premium ACC) waiting for a lot of content that could not come to the game this is an example.
At no point did it claim the infantry would even be playable.
AI infantry will come to War Thunder at some stage, but it will never be playable for good reason.
There are other games where you can play as infantry against tanks if you want.
Even then, they have disclaimers on dev-blogs and purchases pages regarding vehicle properties changing and anyone who knows anything about War Thunder shouldnt be under the expectation that a vehicle wouldnt ever change just because its a premium.
Right, but Gaijin is based in Hungary, the only rules they likely have to worry about is EU laws. Its like expecting people in the UK to only drink at 21 because the minimum legal age in the US is 21. Not how laws work