Was more so referring that the tree as a whole doesn’t even get slightly anything. We have 3 vehicles with alt camos from 6.0-14.0 in total we have like 6 vehicles with alt skins in the entire tree. Its pretty pathetic that gaijin only ever bothers with US and Russia. Im still waiting on the red camo for the KWS (hope the Blue angle skin doesn’t get the same treatment as the KWS one)
1 Like
Not this year since Gaijin recently discovered it was actually the worlds first 7th gen fighter. (why else would it possibly be DELAYED FOR SO LONG)
Lack of care.
I would have figured the potential profits would overcome their profound distaste of adding new things.
We know the F-2A is coming this year from BVVD’s comments in the Russian livestream.
Yeah, they say a lot of things. I’ll believe it when I see it. As of right now I don’t believe it’ll come this year, they seem dead set on adding anything but the F-2.
Gaijin has a track record of adding the absolute bare minimum to Japan, so the F-2A not being in game already is not at all surprising.
2 Likes
I’m just hoping we get a filler update or two this year (preferably with an A-4M late for the US tree)
2 Likes
There are countless interesting entirely new vehicles and mostly unique vehicle variants left to be added.
Hopefully we will see some interesting older designs this year. I’d love to see stuff like the the F3D-2M Skyknight, the F5D-1 Skylancer, F7U Cutlass, the remaining Century Series planes, the Tu-128 Fiddler, the Yak 28P Firebar, the Gnat, the Hawks or really any advanced trainer/light combat aircraft.
Even moreso hoping to see some general gameplay improvements, the return of ARB EC, more interesting maps for both ARB (more complex terrain, better natural cover, more maps with carriers and ships, less ridiculously large trees) and GRB (less corridor maps, less maps that severely limit the viability of SPAAs and SAMs) and finally those new Anti Air systems.
4 Likes
This would be better with a radar trailer
1 Like
I think you can pitbull the AMRAAM, and since they could be later models the seeker is probably improved and even better range than AIM-120A/B
Does amraam have IFF for its own radar?
You can but it should come with multi vehicle SPAAs
No, I don’t think so
Don’t all other US options not really have enough range?
I doubt it, but iirc, the pilot/ground crew could issue a signal for it to self distruct if it were going for the wrong target
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/LQt2NHQQqopJ
1 Like
Trainer aircraft and 6.x spaa for all
1 Like
God I hope, why do we have the worst A4 in the TT
1 Like
Does anyone know if the 4m proxy fuze radius on the Tracked Rapier is correct? Surely they wouldn’t put such a massive trigger radius on a missile with such a tiny warhead (it has like 115g of TNT equivalent more than the Stinger, just 655g, but a 400% larger trigger radius…)
1 Like
You can pitbull the missile if you don’t have a radar. Technically you can do with a radar as well.
1 Like