Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Su-25 guns are fairly punchy and accurate but the limited ammo sucks. The Su-24 has a 9000rpm with only 500 rounds. Fire your gun for a second and your empty lol.

Mig 27M and K were my main grinders on Russia. No bombing just 4 R60M and the glorious 30mm lazer beam gun. (Also the broken flight model)

2 Likes

yeah, thats my only issue with them. compared to the A-10 where you can draw a stick figure with tracers and have ammo left over

A10 is another brain dead vehicle i play to just kill people with bombs. Who needs guns when every noob drops from above and im already pulling my nose up as they get caught in my 2000lb bomb radius.

I have it down to an art where i can kill almost anyone behind me because the people around here are so easy to bait.

Shame the TT 10.7 A10 doesnt get the dual gunpods otherwise id use that since i have the yellow lighting camo for it.

3 Likes

i mostly got gun kills and just shot at ground targets if team got air superiority

I occasionally go for ground but im mainly there for air kills. 4 2000lb bombs for rear defense main gun with tracers, 20mm gunpods with stealth belt and a separate keybind. 2 9L’s for swedish players unfortunate enough to play the J35D.

Peak loadout imo.

1 Like

mine is just 4x 9L and GAU-8. can do basically everything except destroy bases

2 Likes

To be fair most nations haven’t received anything for top tier ground (11.3+) since Air Superiority. Italy (2A7HU) France (2A5NL/2A6NL), and China (HQ17) being the exceptions.

1 Like

F-22A Early would actually be pretty interesting so long as we get some decompression at top tier.

  • up to 2x 9Ms (ie. no 9Xs)
  • up to 4x 120A/Bs, or up to 6x 120Cs (could do C-3s or C-5s)
  • no HMD

Depending on how crazy the stealth is, the F-22 might be more of an analogue to the Rafale and Eurofighter. That or it’ll be the F-14A Early all over again… it all depends on how Gaijin handles it.

4 Likes

It has to get Cs since As and Bs don’t fit in the weapons bay.

It shouldn’t be as amazing as some think due to the average engagement ranges in game being much shorter than real life.

2 Likes

F/A-18E (early) Block I around 2001 ~ Q2 2003. without GBU-38(V)2/B JDAM, GBU-54(V)2/B LJDAM, AGM-154C JSOW, AGM-88E & AGM-88G AARGM, GBU-12F/B DMLGB and AGM-154C-1 JSOW

Fitted AN/APG-73 (RUG phase II) radar like F/A-18C/D but equipped 2nd gen targeting pod AN/AAS-46 TFLIR, and pre integrate JHMCS

F/A-18E (Late) Block II outfitted AN/APG-79 AESA radar

It maybe F/A-18E Block II

bobcat needs some love

1 Like

No, he’s too ugly

Wrong, it could carry As and Bs, up to 4 in the large bays. The point of the Cs was to carry more (6 instead of 4)

3 Likes

I mean, giving it early C missiles would be the same as giving it As/Bs, just that it could carry 2 more (if what you are saying is true anyways).
The Cs would only really differ from the As/Bs in-game if Gaijin goes straight for C-5s or even later ones, which they shouldn’t in case of an early F-22A.

they all have slightly reduced drag from being clipped wing. But won’t have a huge effect. Maybe get a few km farther

I am quite liking F/A-18C; having 10x AMRAAMs is just… something else.

It is tediously slow, but that’s not so bad for me, hahah.

So I am looking forward to F/A-18E, which would have even more (+2) AMRAAMs.

3 Likes

True. Only reason I highlighted the US is b3cause every time someone asks for a top tier ground vehicle for them, a lot of people just respond “hurr durr you just got 3763874 new high tier planes, just be happy”.

1 Like

maybe even less maneuverable because smaller wings

idk, i heard they did something to counteract that but not sure

AIM-120B replace with AIM-120C-5, AIM-9X (Blk I) instead AIM-9L and add AIM-120C-7 after expand max BR to 14.7 or 15.0 in the future

Another guided Air-to-Ground munitions no AGM-84K SLAM-ER, AGM-154C JSOW and GBU-12F/B dual mode laser guided bomb (DMLGB)

F/A-18E early (Block I) early 2000’s era (2001 ~ Q2 2003) unlike F/A-18E (Block II) 2018 ~ 2020