VT-4 would be such a let down as an end of the line vehicle, especially if it’s 12.0.
However seeing as it doesn’t get the APS it could be placed at 11.7, where it would fit a bit better.
doubt it’ll be end of the line, that’s probs reserved for the plot tbh
1 Like
VT-4 isnt an impressive tank either way tho. its an export vehicle based off of an older tank (dont remember what tho) and lacks a bunch of QoL stuff a modern tank would have, but for a nation without much of a military budget its a great tank
I don’t see the point of adding VT4 to Japan.
Japan will have 3 top tier tanks? T84, VT-4 and Type 10? Also F16 and Gripen… What a combo
MBT 2000 which is ingame
any mbt is better then no mbt, plus it defo wouldn’t be end of the line the T84 has as much armour as the BVM ingame along with a better mobility and I think better ERA so it defo be the end
4 Likes
T84 literally Leopard 2a7 combined with t80bvm
T84 Oplot also has a better reload speed IIRC
1 Like
VT-4 might be a premium
or squadron
2 Likes
does it? oh yeh its based on the t80 isn’t it so what 6.5?
Given that Japan already has a higher tier ground squadron vehicle its heavily unlikely Japan would receive a second high tier squadron vehicle
-
What’s the point of adding another clone if u can add a new long awaited vehicle
-
I think Gaijin has ‘special bias’ to China so they won’t add VT-4 to ANY nation except China. U can think i’m wrong. It just a sense
autoloader seems to have been moved to a bustle rack system, which could improve the average reload speed pretty decently, granted this is for later T-84’s, one which Thailand does operate
Bustle was on the Turkish tender vic, Yatagan. This one retains MZ.
no, only T-84-120
the T-84T is an export version of the T-84M, which had the bustle autoloader
T84 Oplot-T will make Japan much stronger anyway
the T-84-120 is also based off of the T-84M, retaining the bustle autoloader but obviously a different one to accommodate the 120mm NATO gun