by the way, does the blue vixen weight include the radar rack or just the radar itself? because compared to the 73 without the rack its only 9kg lighter than the AN/APG-73
I have no idea. I’ve just heard it was about half the size of the AN/APG-70 series radar and comprable to the AN/APG-73 in terms of performance.
If you really want to go there USSR TT could possibly receive the Abrams, Challenger, and Leopard.
Tht t84 probs should get chinese ammo due to the thai using the vt4 along side it
Its the “production” HSTVL, a bit slower, less armour, faster reload, but overall a near same tank.
That weird boxy thing is a thing of beauty good sir.
1 Like
yeah both claims make sense, however from a forecast international report on the blue vixen the 73 was considered to be slightly better, from another forecast international report (they have more detailed numbers for certain systems), the 73 range is >60nm (111km) so they are pretty close
I think its this thing:
Basically a HSTV-L but with two quad-stinger pods.
So that plus the HSTV-L’s proximity airburst rounds is quite potent.
gepard 1a2 counterpart?
That is not the RDF/LT.
This is
6 Likes
All the best usa ground stuff is premium :,(
Better, Gepard doesn’t have proximity fuse, it also has way more credible AA and anti-armour capabilities than the Gepard does.
Afaik the RDF/LT has a gun similar to the Bulldog rather then the HSTV-L
The Stinger one to my knowledge has no solid evidence that it was ever built. At the very least, I haven’t seen any images of it or documents saying it was.
1 Like
That’s a different one that was aimed to be exported, but never found customers.
1 Like
tunguska counterpart? maybe a bit lower
I’m assuming this one is a mockup then?
It would only have Stingers, so it would still be far from a Tunguska counterpart.
1 Like
I believe so.
1 Like