What and make it worse lol
If I recall correctly, Rafale, compared to Eurofighter, would be:
-Lighter.
-More maneuverable.
-But smaller payload capacity (12 vs 9 air to air missiles?).
-And worse radar.
?
Rafale is heavy… Font underestimate it.
Better radar
Less payload
So I got it right the other way around, got it lmao
They won’t be introducing stuff like the AIM-9X at the moment. We’ve been told that we aren’t even remotely close to the introduction of such missiles.
EF has prob the best Mechscan out there… With Tranche 4 they are replacing it with an aesa
New Red Effect video, concerning new details unveiled about the T-14 Armata. Could we see the tank in game anytime soon?
Probably not, unless they start also adding stuff like the AbramsX or Leopard 2A8, which would force them to invent new vehicles for some nations
they have already invented vehicles lol
Hard disagree Magic II is crazy imo
Just saying how every American top tier + a potential super hornet is gonna carry the same a2a missiles
True, but judging by how they straight up refuse to add stuff like the ACA and EAP I don’t think they will be returning to that anytime soon
EAP mentioned, Smin takes 1 psychic damage
what an ugly little duckling hiding it’s air intakes, adding Extra much RCS with that wide fuselage
EFT is slick and Proud of it’s Air intake! just like the F-16
Possibly, not neccessary, whats more likely is probably the T-80BVM Mod.23(its not much different except a better round)
Its the equivalent to vicious mokery from D&D. 1d4 psychic damage… increases by 1d4 when you reach 5th level (2d4), 11th level (3d4), and 17th level (4d4).😁
Even the round it would fire (BM59) wouldn’t be much better.
Better round? 3BM42-2?
I thought the only difference (that matters in WT) was an upgraded transmission.
Anyway I think the Armata would probably be the best tank at top tier if added anyway, but if/when we get the KF51 or the 2A8, the T-14 will be a nice counterpart.