Pantsir has 12 tubes, in a certain event in Europe there are reports they are integrating an anti drone missile along with the Pantsirs standard missiles.
this would mean thet can with the current version use different missile at the same time. from the same singular launch vehicle
For FB-10/FB-10A carrier, it’s invalid. The FB-10, the truck one, is a old and quickly outdated product, it;s quickly abandoned, so now only FB-10A, no more FB-10.
and all these vehicles are prototypes for sale, and all very new, so no necessity to upgrade.
No need to argue about FB10, like I said last time, Gaijin can’t tell the difference between FB-10 and FB-10A, just like PL-8 and PL-8B, the same goes for PL-9
Russia should have gotten the TOR-M1 with China.
Sky Sabre for the UK would be the direct counterpart of the SPYDER having 20-22km range missiles that can be guided by the launch vic
With the december update probably bringing in the F-18, all nations should have atleast a 20km range SPAA unit. Preferably 20km+ for the nations not receiving an F-18 equivalant (basically all minor nations).
probably lol, can already see it now, someone else gets an 18-20km range missile and they will cry for a better one, the amount of people I seen get mad and upset that they removed the Grom with a rocket engine was insane lol
The Arietes and Merkava Mk.4 are serious contenders for that title.
Arietes sure, I would argue the Merkavas with their 5 second reload are now superior
I think as overall series, Ariete and Merk4 are weaker. But TES / OES, maybe even 2F too, hands down have to be worst individually.
Chally series has better highs, but lower lows lol.
With a lot of CR2 and ariete AMV(and Chinese top tier, but these are a different design) gameplays, I unironically consider merkavas to be OP
Worse gun depression, worse armor, worse survivability. They are nato style MBTs that are handicapped in what is good about nato style tanks.
The merkavas can take the CR2 playstyle but better. M338 can potentially UFP T-80Us etc, trading surviability for armor, and more machine guns in case some apaches comes in rushing. The merkavas are also pretty mobile.
Merk’s have literally no KE armour anywhere tho
Neither does the CR2, but when I play the merkava mk.3s, I dont die to ammoracks. :/
I mean Chally still has its cheeks but yeah, the hull is awful, huge mantlet is awful, and charge bins everywhere sucks.
The Challenger 2s playstyle is to sit hull down in a ditch, yet the Merkava Mk.4 with worse armor, worse survivability and worse gun depression can do that better?
Except the Mk.4s really have neither.
I think we can all agree both tanks suffer. Both have their flaws. Arguing who suffers more is like arguing if you’d rather be missing an arm or a leg lol.
there is no secret code this is BS
