Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

which confirmes that it is fake aswell. Kranvagn is a vehicle similar to the removed corelian

2 Likes

Kranvagn, unlike Coelian used dedicated chassis which was built and was used in Strv103 trials.
The turret wasnโ€™t made sadly
If true (and I hope it is), that means Sweden would get their first tech tree heavy.

Aussie Hornet. Sad. if this is real we wonโ€™t ever see the CF-188 in the game then(as this is the only time we could see it unlike the Aussies who also have Super Hornets). (after all, being used as โ€œfillerโ€ is how you donโ€™t see 99% of your stuff in-game(and when it is it isnโ€™t in an obtainable way.))

Type XXX is the class, U XXX is the specific submarine. For example, the one that was in the game in the Battle of the Atlantic event was a Type VII, the U 995.

7 Likes

All naval vessels in-game are identified by their names or ID numbers, with only a few exceptions.

Ngl this looks realistic as hell lol

1 Like

Same as the corelian. Doesnt matter if itโ€™s a new chassie or in the case of the corelian the panther chassie. If the turret wasnโ€™t build itโ€™s not good enough for gaijin if we go after the corelian.

They would need to add the corelian back into the tech tree if they add the kranvagn

I think itโ€™s pie-in-the-sky, but fun

1 Like

The leak
GIF_20241125_212503_198

6 Likes

This is like the third or fourth time I have seen HVSD/ADAMS on discord list, and my heart can no longer take being broken.

On this basis, I call it fake.

2 Likes

when did this list came into your hands ?

Yeah but wouldnt the type be next to it if itโ€™s a leaked vehicle? In the event the subs were only named type VII and not the specific submarine

While I was on the toilet.

What if they add the Kranvagn anyways?

Then itโ€™s a double standard + that opens up possibilities for many other vehicles

Wouldnโ€™t shock me.

Sweden has other ridiculous things like Kungstiger, Mi28, AHS, T80Uโ€ฆ So whatโ€™s another โ€˜what ifโ€™ in the pile lol.

2 Likes

Which was ?

the only reason why Iโ€™m asking is because itโ€™s it was before 15 gmt then it may be something interesting

Hey Mr. Gszabi, how do you think about this leak?
Are they real?
b

AN/APG-73 RUG II radar or AN/APG-79(V)4 AESA radar ?

Targeting pod AN/AAS-38B NITE Hawk or AN/AAQ-28(V)4 LITENING AT or AN/AAQ-28(V)8 Litening G4

F-14D or F-14D(R)

4 fighter aircraft top tier could get AIM-120C-5

Why not Mirage 2000H ?

My opinion, MiG-29SMT (9-19) from soviet/russia tech tree carried R-77-1

MiG-29K (9-31) or MiG-29KR (9-41) ?

Why not the early domestic PLANAF 4th gen fighter aircraft ?

MS18 standard, my guess.

But no internal 27 mm Mauser BK-27 revolver cannon ?

Would be Rafale M F1

I donโ€™t think so.

17 Likes