The two F-5s are for Japan btw
Somehow i could see the Thai F-5A as a winter event reward like they have done with the American one.
True, but tragically heavier than a loaded F-14
actually no clue how they managed that tbh, impressive really
Thats a Mirage 2000TH
no. even russian sources stays that its SARH
Kind of pointless additon when M2K H can be added
1 Like
If this leak is real, they are adding the most boring options for the Indian subtree. This only gives more ammo to certain people here who shall remain nameless to complain about Indian vehicles. Why cant we have interesting Indian vics man. Why does it have to be another M2K. The only special thing about it is the A2G weapons capabilities, and half those weapons arent in the game right now. Its just a M2K-5F for UK
It will, India has a T-90M equivalent
Even has indigenous composite and ammo
1 Like
yeah man, Give us the super advanced Unique Indian vehicles, like the Arjun…
So advanced that its the only tank in which the crew Hatches double as blowout panels
3 Likes
And dare I say, at the risk of starting another heated debate, the Arjun Mk1A is a 11.3-11.7 capable vehicle
2 Likes
Bruh
Thats a cool little fact. Do you have any documents or diagrams to back that completely factual statement up?
Hence why i said cf18 us premium, aussie jets go to britian if needed.
Except it’s not, it’s has ARGSN with two stage, in simpler terms it’s both SARH and ARH.
There was a video of the alleged “Blowout panels” in use I saw a while back and you can clearly see that the Explosion is venting through the commanders hatch, not a blowout panel, I dont have the video to hand but there is this promotional image
3 Likes
Odd, because every time its BR came up, the conclusion is that it would be 10.3(now 10.7) at most, and that was being generous.
but on the actual tank there is no Panel between the ammo and crew compartments (like the abrams has a door to seal it off)
at least thats what ive been told
No its not actually very clear. Have you considered that the blowout panel might not be exactly the same as the NATO standard?
well, almost all “normal” sources state only SARH.