Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Its the same rule like with certain countrys where you can buy a gun but all parts seperatly and its perfectly legal to own it but the second you put all the parts togheter its illegal.
makes no sense but its true XD

They wont, they always get this much and they never change. We only got 3 rounds for the decompress because it was a unique situation.

We’ll just have to try again in Jan/Feb in 3 months time. But they’ll ignore the community again for the most part

1 Like

Wednesdays are usually the It’s fixed weekly updates, so I think it’s likely they will throw the BR changes in with them.

SAM missiles have always been funny for me like that. I cant even count how many times i have killed a tank with the Tunguska or Rolands missiles 😂

SAMs seem more consistent in overpressuring tanks than ATGMs do half the time.

1 Like

Except for those they push the changes to dev on Tuesday. That hasn’t happened today. I wouldn’t expect a proper It’s Fixed for today.

2 Likes

image

1 Like

F-14A Early in the 70’s no all-aspect IR missile

In the future, I’m waiting F-14A (1980) & F-14A (1998)

AIM-9M replace AIM-9L in the tier III modification

RWR AN/ALR-45 for F-14A Early 70’s. but in the 80’s change to AN/ALR-50

F-14A in the 80’s & 90’s armed all-aspect IR missile instead rear-aspect

@Smin1080p_WT

Looking at the list again it gets even funnier. The base M1A2, which probably better than a lot of the vehicles that are moving to 12.0, actually seems to stay at 11.7.

So yes. The 2PL is now at the same BR as the M1A2, while worse tanks like the Merkava Mk.4s, Leclerc S1/S2, Black night etc are moving to 12.0 lol.

3 Likes

Gajin implemented change battle rating of this thursday or friday. my guess

How is Black Night worse? This is gaijin realizing that they cannot balance the piece of Superior British Engineering for it is too early for the game.

Wait, so now M1A1 AIM is at the same BR as M1A2 despite lacking CITV, having worse armor and a much worse shell…?


Gaijin completely missed the point about Leopard 2A5.

The point isn’t that Leopard 2A5 should be lower; the point is that tanks that are objectively better should be higher…

12.0 does nothing.

2 Likes

M1 Abrams is at a even worse situation. M774 isn’t good enough for 10.7 BR. Gaijin should give it M833 or revert its br change.

3 Likes

Why would we all come together to ruin a random vehicle?

They usually suspend the " It 's Fixed " series when it 's close to a major update anyway, right ?

изображение

gib hornet

I might sound like a broken record here, but in the case of the M26 that’s basically what happened?
Players provide reasoning and compare the vehicle to it’s peers with regard to it’s actual capabilities, meaning what the machine itself is capable/not capable of, and in the end it is disregarded in favor of statistics that unfortunately is polluted by highly variable quality of the playerbase

So if I want the M26 to go down in BR I have to convince all it’s users to deliberately play poorly?

I’m really curious to know how the statistics compare between the T26E5 and M26, they are at the same BR the only difference is that the T26E5 is vastly more armored for a very slight mobility decrease. As others have pointed out, there is no reason to play the M26 anymore because it doesn’t bring anything to the table.

4 Likes

Gaijin: ok we gib osa thats also hornet

It didn’t send a message the last time the playerbase did it lol