Im going to commit the Sin by pinging you but its a honest question. @Smin1080p_WT any plans to reduce the cost of the KV-1A m1942 with it going down in BR? It wouldn’t make sense for it to still cost 2.8k GE while other 4.7’s cost 1.7K GE
Also you wouldn’t happen to know if the RPM or the turret thickness are planned to be changed anytime soon would you?
i would much prefer verdi-2 with a 40MM and star streaks and a funny extendable comader sight
I just know that the “Japanese mains cry” are @Fireraid233 , @Noveos_Republic , @Grzegames and me @Rowiek
Should just add a section for me mentioning something something finland something something poor implementation something something pings Forum mod
Verdi 2 had a dummy gun cos im pretty sure the cta 40 wasnt even finished when it was made
Dutch tanks i want to see:
Braat overvalwagen AA
M110A2 Howitser
Ram 2D (Late) (QF 75)
CV9035NL MLU
Dutch and German project (RDM and Rheinmetall) where they armed an M109 with the main gun of a PzH 2000. Giving the vehicle acces to the same ammunition, and the reload system was also upgraded giving the vehicle a fire rate of 9 - 10 rounds per minute.
DAF YP-408 PWAT
No, I wouldn’t really say that I’m a Japanese mains cry, I’m just making suggestions for Japan like crazy. Currently waiting for 10 suggestions
I did make suggestions too.
Stopped with it.
Even if i write everything in my own words, it just gets marked as plagiarism.
If I write everything in my own words it would not be plagarism, but the professors will not be happy.
i belive so but said mock 40mm eventualy became the 40MM in ajax and the ebrc jaguar. so working out the data for the gun should be feasible to workout
LMAOOOOO, same same.
But when making suggestions, everything has to be in your own interpetations.
This is why I stopped making suggestions. I made a suggestion about a boat in the old forum, even though it had no plagiarized content it still got removed. I just copied one information panel from the manufacturers website but Mods said that counts as Plagiarism. Even after removing that and writing that part again by myself it still got rejected.
Same issue here.
I think its the suggestion moderators.
Because when i look at lets say, an American, Russian fighter jet.
Most information is just all over the place. No consitency whatsoever, etc…
When I listen to this, I have no idea why they accept my suggestions. There is some error in almost every one
No i was right CTA international wasnt even a company when the verdi 2 was made
CTA 90s VERDI 2 80s
I got 3 suggestions thru and I’d call two of them not all that great. currently waiting on two more to be passed.
Too OP, won’t come. It exceed any META
Gripen variant blah blah… What about Viggen variant? There are couple cool ones to add still, for example:
JA37Di with RB99:
AJSH37:
Very early JA37 variant with RB24, RB27/28 and no flares:
Additional pic with all Viggen variants
i mean what i am looking says verdi-2 was started a year before the founding on CTA and tests were on going for the next 2 years
