@KhorneFlakez1337 i am against the whole thing either way
if you ask me allow mixed line ups from every nation, give people reason to grind multiple tech trees,
no argument for uhhh my country lacks this or that, just put that sth in from another country
guys like canada can make their line ups etc
just restrict research to still be only to the vehicles nations used trees
There me just hoping for the Tomahawk as it would be a nice Fighter-bomber for Britain
This is one of the options for addition as event vehicle. I despise IFVs with Bushmaster.
BVVD did confirm a Chinese subtree of multiple nations, though we don’t know which. It’s likely Pakistan and Bangladesh since they’re already in the Chinese tree, and the way it was worded probably more too.
North Korea would make sense too !
Also I’m pretty sure the Arethusa class was literally a British ship gifted to Taiwan briefly that more or less got stolen and then sunk in about 3 months having no active service career. It’s a little bit dubious if you ask me.
Also the Arethusa’s are barely 5.3 worthy and then there’s nothing to bridge that gap. Particularly as almost no modern ASHM will do anything to a Capital ship.
At least with Sweden they have coastal ‘battleships’ on the level of things like HMS Dreadnought/Invincible. So that takes them to 6.3 and they also have one of the most potent potential coastal fleets possible.
Yeah, outside of export variants of course like the Jordan challenger or Omani Hunter
Chongqing, or known as the aurora, was transferred to the nationalists as a return when Britain conscripted nine Chinese merchant ships in Hong Kong when the war broke out. It defected to the communists in 1948, and was sunk by B-24s.
It did serve in the civil war, during the nationalist siege on tashan pass, it bombarded the communist forces positions with its guns. However it did not change the tide of the battle or any campaigns in the second civil war.
To go beyond that, without considering missile-capable ships, would be a 1913 battlecruiser commissioned towards Italy. It is said to have up to 12 10-ins, but there was not even a single draft being drawn - needless to say any diagrams.
Ahhh…
A very mixed career then.
Yeah as far as i’m concerned the Chinese navy isn’t viable. Sweden is though until ~6.3
If they want to introduce a new game mode then that would be the only way to make the chinese navy (and others) work, and could also attract more players, hopefully though that wouldn’t mean the end of dreadnought developments which are already at a snails pace.
the leak suggests boxer
what could gaijin quickly low effort kitbash together for the germany…
exports another matter yeah,
as long as the modifiying nation isnt part of the game
Its gonna take 3 years til top tier naval made it to the end of WW2. Perhaps by then Britain will get its KGV.
Thats a good idea, i may buy the hedgehog as well, but I am more inclined to use 5.3
The Crusader’s and the Hurricane with the 40mm are just blatant sea clubbing. lol
For it to work you just need to spawn in the Hedgehog at any point in the battle for the points to be counted.
I’m gonna swap the SARC out for something else idk what though
Btw if anyone is wondering how the subtree could look like then you can check this thread. Even if we exclude copy paste ground vehicles still there will be at least 50 unique ground vehicles which is probably enough for filling some gaps.
SPAA Crusader thingy?
Is that good ? and that at 3.0 m8
Ah… and I dont know, I never play that low :D
