Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1) (Part 1)

A premium Type-10… Imagine…
And if Gaijin really want all out - another Type-90 premium but then a prototype version.

That would spike the sales for JP so much… Perhaps we’ll finally get more vehicles per update, perhaps some Domestic Japanese vehicles for ground and air for once.

because it can carry 12 R77

and since when are there dual racks for micas?

Yeah.
Although, i think i prefer an African Union TT over Poland.
The African Union is a little bit the same as Poland, but has more unique stuff.
That means Korea can have it’s own thing.

i dont know, it wont be very hard to do it since they added micas on a Russian jet

Actually that picture is taken May 2024, after Romania first picked Abrams.
Romania still thinks of choosing K2 after Abrams’ maintenance and fuel cost are very high

https://x.com/MApNRomania/status/1973023355562578240
Since 2025 second project started and we’ll have to see if Romania finally choose K2

1 Like

20 more nations needed and still barely more unique

1 Like

Poland offers over like what, 200-300 vehicles as single nation?
How many do 55 member states of African union have to offer?

@Smin1080p_WT
What is the reason that Thailand hasn’t received it’s “Aero L-39 Albatros” and Malaysia the “Douglas A-4PTM” and “Aermacchi MB-339A”?
These vehicles are already ingame, and for the Indonesian A-4E, the skin is already ingame in the Israeli TT. It would solve a great CAS gap for JP. So i don’t understand why these weren’t added at the start of the introduction of the TT.

The fact that it takes 20 nations doesn’t matter, it’s in 1 TT and like you said, it’s more unique, even when it’s barely.

The fact that it takes 20 nations does matter, it just shows how bad this tech tree is
The flag customization would be hell too.
Also Poland is much more unique, putting ZU 23 2 and DShKs on bunch of trucks is repetetive, especially when there is 900 variants of them.

5 Likes

Because I haven’t seen the air tree yet, Polish ground looks more unique so far, but there is no point in comparing a co alition tree (consiting of over 21 nations) to 1 singular nation

4 Likes

UI would have a heart attack xD

1 Like

Uh? Did i miss a plane?
In game whe have the 326b and k, nor 339

It’s not really, since it’s all in one TT.

Howcome? Germany has 14 different flags, and Great Britain has 12.

Well, if you looked at the suggestion, you would know that this statement is not true.
It has tons of light vehicles with all varieties of weaponry, most noticeably 72mm to 140mm range.

Its their take on modernized Soviet slop (not all that good still)

They might but it’s unlikely for them to switch after such a costly order of Abrams

Yeah, it was on the old forum.
But copying it over was considered plagiarism. So i couldn’t do it.
But it’s air is pretty unique as well all things considered. But it also contains the usual C&P.
It sounds stupid, but you have to believe me on my word for this one. I don’t know if someone is perhaps making a new proposal though.

at the end of the day, it’s about a single TT. If 21 nations would make a more unique TT then a TT with only 1 nation, it would be rather peculiar to add the nation with 1 TT because it consist of only 1 nation.
So if a single TT can be more unique with a coalition, i’d prefer to play that over a nation which is less unique but consists of 1 nation alone.

I do understand the significance of Poland, but i’d rather see it as sub-TT. Especially since Poland also imported a ton, especially at top tier.
Or, a central European alliance TT, with Serbia, Slovak, Czech, Poland, Bulgaria and Bosnia.

Duh, but no such rack exists for the MICA

they can take the rack from the r77 and put the adaptors so they can carry micas, i don’t know if they have done it but if they have such planes does not have a place in the game