Russia has a few captured Leos iirc, if they upgrade them then for gaijin thats enough reason these days. US is more on the “probably not” side
Lets be real here, how many times have they said X thing in the past that turned out to be done anyway?
we hummelcoping already?
they have been consistent with that rule
List too long to load
1 Like
I salute your trust into gaijin lmao
they literally have been keeping that rule, do you know how much nato stuff has been suggested for RU?
also the nuclear fallout this would cause…
1 Like
They dont really care though.
E.g. Abrams to China, but VT-4 and VN-1C can’t go to Japan.
Ive seen enough, 2A4SG to Japan
1 Like
tbh that was kinda a timing thing on their side too (trying to add chinese vehicles to japan just before the memorial day of the invasion of china by japan, iirc), and tbh japan can have coal if they want
Why only one? Along with that add Leo 2RI, cause why not :D
sure why not, they could use a good MBT to fill the lineups
Fixed Type 90 and Type 10 mobility when
1 Like
And the Ukrainian tank wont get as broken ERA as the Russians ones.
If they make kontakt-5 broken, they can surely make the ukrainian one broken as well, yet they dont, what a surprise they can implement something semi-correct when it’s not Russian.
Strange expression
Unique stuff most likely premium or event, just like all other Indian stuff. C&P goes to TT as seen with the SPAA’s.
Tunguska to britain… yeah thats gonna be fun lmao
You forgot the automatic nerf it will get since more narions besides Russia got the SPAA.
Same happend with the Strela. Immidiate nerf after it got placed in Hungary and India in their respective TT’s.
see it positive, russian tunguskia gonna get mid too then