Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1) (Part 1)

Oh you mean single famous photo where mock-ups mounted on airframe?

I wonder why there is no single fire footage, or demonstrator that shows seeker capabilities, thats right because missile doesnt exist in any form aside from bein mock-up.

You guys delibarelty avoiding any questions about KH-38MT by showing single questionable photo and claiming its real while many sources indicates its the other way around.

Please spare me that lame excuse.

1 Like

There wasnt any firing footage of many modern Russian munitions until the last couple of years. Even now, some known ones still dont have clear footage.

Its not been a requirement to have something in game that it must have footage. Otherwise many modern things wouldn’t make it.

Please do not diverge from the topic. Its been spammed enough already here and is exactly why I said its been answered so many times so we dont have to go down another off topic spiral yet again.

2 Likes

Yeah there is also zero credible sources about test firing nor seeker performance.

Even most credible sources states current seeker should be gen 1 with much worse zoom capabilities and detection/tracking range yet somehow it has better zoom and thermals than most dedicated TGP’s at top tier.

Is that so? Then can we get MICA missiles for Gripen E since SAAB advertise that its compatible with airframe and FCS, oh wait you guys actually denied that due to lacking footage nor test results.

Rules for thee but not for us I guess…

Its been spammed multiple times because Gaijin added such a controversial weapon system that has no credible sources and ignored all those concerns so naturally that was expected to be happen.

3 Likes

Thsts not correct. It has not been denied for footage. Simply the information thus far has not been sufficient to show it actually was. Its nothing to do with requiring footage.

Gripen E has both Brimstone and SPICE. There is no footage for either on Gripen. Yet it has both due to offical sources.

2 Likes

Like KH-38MT case?

There is no proper information about its performance/seeker, let alone having actual test results yet Gaijin decided to add with imaginary specs.

Official sources also indicates that its compatible with MICA so what’s stopped Gaijin adding the weapon system?

I understand you have nothing do with additions in this game but please stop trying to defend one of most questionable addition in this game.

2 Likes

Not at all.

Its about confirming compatability with Gripen. The KH-38 family compatability is well known.

Many of those sources also offer conflicting information about other systems that may not have been and offer only what may be for potential customers.

Again, it has SPICE and Brimstone without footage. So the claim footage is required is not correct. Simply clearer information is needed. But there is nothing against it getting them if that info comes to light.

I will ask for a final time to please now stop with the off topic. Since you ignored the first one. Again, this was the very reason why I said it has been answered so many times. Because its just used as an opportunity to derail the topic.

the F4F Early is currently 10.3 with 9J

the reduction to 9B would definetly warrant more than one step of BR

I wish I could see this beautiful Polish Tankette (it will be the best tankette in the game)
image

6 Likes

With that logic could we see more SRAAMs?

Spoiler

images - 2026-05-11T090009.422


images - 2026-05-11T090020.427

Mirage with SRAAM?

Sadly no proof of integration on any of these. Only the Hunter and Harrier is known.

The brochure with the silhouettes was just potential customer aircraft.

1 Like

Polish L3 isnt real, it cant hurt you
Polish L3:

TKS 20 my beloved little rat

So no SRAAM for Tornado/F-4 Phantom?
Sad /s

MiG-21S sells well too, why shouldn’t an Early phantom?

I proposed 9.3 for the F4F early because I compare it to the MiG-21F-13/PFM/S which are also Supersonic, much more agile and have comparable missiles
since the F4F doesn’t have Radar missiles the better radar doesn’t make a difference for it so I excluded it from the BR calculation

F4D with AIM-7E2 would be 11.0-11.3 just like the F4E, which is why I proposed weaker missiles to keep the BR down

I’m generally a Fan of lower BRs at the cost of worse armarment

1 Like

This is likely the week bois

For what?

which week? the first blog week?

the week of all weeks

Its THE Week :)