a man can dream
4 Likes
yeah, tho in all honesty the cap for SQRP should be raised, with the amount of vehicles and the removal of banking the SQRP, having to basically waste it when there is nothing of interest is bad.
And some of them do in fact have a benefit in SQBs, either a lower BR than a similar vehicle or additional payload that the TT stuff lacks.
I feel like each subtree has an individual set of problems. There isn’t really one that works perfectly all around as is.
For example with BeNeLux it’s a big part that the subtree includes three nations, but seems to overly focus on Belgium for air, with the Netherlands lagging behind comparatively. For example Belgium gets three freely accessible F-16s, while the only Dutch F-16 is a past event. For ground a similar thing happens, but this time only Dutch vehicles are here in the first place with nothing for Belgium.
Luxembourg also doesn’t get anything at all, despite at least having three vehicles that could be added.
There’s also a similar issue to South Africa (air) or Switzerland, where the ground techtree for France is relatively full, with 5 existing lines, so that there isn’t a lot of space for BeNeLux vehicles. Space is probably always an issue, subtree or not, but here it’s more pronounced.
4 Likes
another british lineup nerfed by them uptiering a vehicle that really didnt need to go up and britain 8.7 now has no cas other than a premium thats better than the scimitar at a lower br
1 Like
Does anyone have any guesses on where Indian rafale and SU-30MKI would be placed in British tree?
Rafale after F/A-18 and maybe Su30 will be placed in the same line as well
2 Likes
But isn’t that naval line? Carrier based Rafale would make sense in F-18 line up, but why SU-30 in that line and what about non carrier based Rafale?
1 Like
i feel both rafale c and the su30MKI would be placed under the Tornado f.3 late and there getting rafale m which would be under the hornet
2 Likes
This does make sense
“For other MANPADS systems, open sources indicate a higher overload such as 18, 20 and even 25g in the case of the Mistral 1 MANPADS. However, these MANPADS systems have only slight differences in the area of aerodynamic surfaces compared to the 9M39”
4 Likes
is this real?
Next update: we have been working hard on infantry as we know theres no future for war thunder. So here is another f16 and a boat
Yes
not a hug
2 Likes
im getting angery
5 Likes
This thing absolutely dominated 8.7 squadron battles for years, it still gives me nightmares.
yeah sqaudron battles in realistic battles idk what makes it better than the G91 or the A4
1 Like
dud’s confirmed?
Zusammenfassung
1 Like
Same! The Fokker bombers like the T.V would be cool too!
And I would love a Dutch P-51, saw the one in Soesterberg and it’s a beauty!
2 Likes