Eh, w/ 9Ls it could work at 10.3 maybe 10.0 but it’d be another 9L slinger death mobile…
Maybe with R-60s at 9.7ish?
Eh, w/ 9Ls it could work at 10.3 maybe 10.0 but it’d be another 9L slinger death mobile…
Maybe with R-60s at 9.7ish?
I had my loadout name in a screenshot I took called out for what it said despite that just being Danish lmao
10.3 with no flares and needing to carry a gunpod?
9.7 with R60s and no flares while the Ayit with 9Gs and flares is 9.7 or the Yak-38 with 4x R60s at 9.3
Again the Mk.51A is just a modernized trainer hawk with no CM’s and no internal gun.
The Arjuns shell is gunna be really funny
im gonna go on a rant about the statements made in the new br change list because it seems wrong in a lot of ways
Starting off

its said the su30MK2 AMV and Su30MKK perform similarly to the aircraft at there br. this is wrong when it comes to rank 8 premiums the su30MKK specifically is at the top with the su30mk2 being being worse due to well mostly russian players, when it comes to K/D the su30MKK is performing fine along with 13.7 jets even performing better than the F2 and J11B as seen here
we also have the infamous BMPT still causing issues after 5 months since its release

according to this there “data” shows the bmpt is fine with only moving up 1 br step to 11.7 even though while the time its been at 11.3 the 10.3-12.3 br brackets have been mostly dominated by the bmpts
the final thing because im getting bored

just about the only good thing to come out of the br changes is recognition of the M61 APHE shell for the brits but ive still got my money on them forgetting about it in a few months time and this statement going absolutely nowhere.
Long story short for people who dont want to read the whole thing is basically both the su30 statement and the bmpt statement are just incorrect and probably the only reason there not doing much about it is because of money like always except the tech tree bmpt
Nah snail will change its name
the penetration what blast.

There is no ETA currently but it is indeed a bug and not a suggestion. So will be treated as such.
The memes will be everywhere when it gets added lol
Yeah, that’s something to be careful about in-game though. Some try to pull the “but i wasn’t saying the bad word in English, i was saying this other word in this other language” as a way to try to circumvent moderation (a vast majority of the time it’s painfully obvious that that isn’t what they were doing because the word in the other language doesn’t make sense in the context).
Also you’ll be lucky if snail even gives it a single other camo choice. That’s not a nation they like lol
when the arjun eventually gets added with the penetration you know what blast shell would the name have to be altered do you think?
Yeah there’s definitely some words that are pretty close to some sus words lmao
so when F15IA or F15SG for better jet to Israel tech tree?
SAAF Hawk dispensing CMs (iirc)

Finnish Hawk rear… I’m not too familiar with our hawks… and tbf it’d get a gunpod from the whole “it’s compatible” yada yada.

The Finnish Hawks don’t have CM’s only the later model hawks have them
Interesting… something something MiG-25PD )))))))))
Anyways, doubt it’ll come but even with dubious CMs I’d be happy.
It would be like giving the vehicle a new tail section just to give it flares, it simply doesn’t have another variant of the 51 to get flares from
Well it won’t come because it’s Finnish and if it does it’ll be another premium vehicle
It’d be some 400k SRP squadron vic knowing my luck…