So does this mean that outstanding bug reports for the Cheiftain won’t be actioned?
1 Like
thats sort of fair enough but also eh. player performance depending br obviously is a fine way of doing things but vehicle statistics have to sort of come into play right? i meant the cheiftain mk10 literally has no advantage against any other 9.3 or 9.0 tank unless is hull down
it most likely wont unless the vehicle performance plumets which wont happen because britain mains are to good at the game
it should also get an engine buff and the round changed from the fake “l23” to l23a1
1 Like
This important quote refers to the number of paid Drakens being higher than the tech tree one(s) or the constant urge to not give a tech tree Draken for 5 years
And su-35 :)
@Smin1080p_WT Good Morning, i have a question: If a certain Aircraft had in real life Aim9p-3 and p4, would they get it or not? like i think some aircraft are missing their missels, as they used it in real life, but doesnt have it in game. Will i need to give then a official dokument that says the information of its weoponary? (of course not classified)
Not at all. Bug reports have nothing to do with BR changes. Unless its something like suggestions for new shells, which are indeed a balancing matter.
All weaponary in game is subject to balance considerations for the loadouts. Its not just a case of it has it so it gets it.
In some cases this would be detrimental to many aircraft platforms if they got missiles taking them to BRs above what their flight performance can handle.
what about a draken with 2-4 aim9p4? balenced or not?
You can submit a suggestion report and it will be down to the developers to decide.
4 Likes
Speaking of, would it be possible to suggest the 2x 3 AGM-65 Pylons because possible for the F-4F?
Because, while the Abbility to use AGM-65 is removed on the F-4F Early(because cheap), the F-4F brought this back as can be seen by having AGM-65 in game/IRL
We know a nation does not has to actually have/use said Weapon IRL, to get it in game
F-4 AGM-65 amount
F-4C: None
F-4E: 6x
F-4EJ: None
F-4EJ: None
F-4EJ Kai: None
F-4F Early: None
F-4F : 2x
F-4F ICE: 2x
F-4J(all): None
F-4S: None
Phantom FGR.2: None
Phantom: FG.1: None
Kurnass: 6x
Kurnass 2000: 6x
1 Like
Additionally if the F4F could finally get its historical Aim9Ls instead of 9Js that would be grand.
I guess F-15E in 2020 - 2026 equipments and closer to F-15EX early production.
But never integraded AIM-9X Block II sidewinder, AIM-260A JATM and AN/ASG-34(V)1 Legion pod
Personally, gaijin prepare 5th gen infrared Air-to-Air Missile before 5 gen and 5.5 gen fighter aircraft
But increase maximum battle rating (Air battle mode) higher current battle rating with 5th gen IR missile on 4th gen fighter aircraft and 4++ gen fighter aircraft
Surely this time after it allready didnt went further in the Original br change thread
The su30sm2 is a su35…it can carry all the missiles the su35 can carry…same radar same engines…same fbw…
Why JH-7 went up to have no lineup and forced China to use Q-5L against Pantsirs with its 11.7 lineup? It makes zero sense and feedback was provided by community for this change yet it still went through.
1 Like
What did you expect ? cash cow bmpt gets nerfed. therefore they punish other areas due to greed malice and ineptitude. we should stop expecting rational logical decisions by them at this point going forward.
Also its very funny how the su24 was untouched when it can do everything the jh7 can with relative ease.
Yeah, China needs tons of aircraft, especially CAS aircraft around 9.0 untill 12.0
1 Like
well guys after testing you can roll the PL-12 can like the sparrow and dodge it now… so it’s EVEN WORSE than an AMRAAM.
they killed chinese top tier. for NO REASON AT ALL!
3 Likes