My brother in christ you litterally started that post with “they (Gaijin) said”.
You just admitted you straight up lied.
ah it was typo. What I want to said is DEMO II as it is base of PSO’s hull
I remember this, it 's in Smin 's post history on the old forum. I’ll get the link to it.
1 Like
no that was me cutting of the quote, the demo II doesnt have the internal armor of the strv122 either, only the add on plates on top
I remember Smin saying something like that about the Challenger 3 and SEPv3 a year or so back. But never about the SEPv2.
Anyway, you would be a real legend if you managed to dig up something that far back.
Lmao you’re the one that stated gaijin said sepv2 was not planned for the near future when they never said that. Next time dont post misinformation.
1 Like
Says the person potentially creating fake Gaijin statements.
Kinda wish we get improvement on time fused ammunition like disabling the time fuse for it just to be regular HE or HEAT.
Or is there already a way to? If there is please describe I hate time fused shells.
Don’t lase the target, then it simply acts like normal HE since you haven’t inputted a distance to explode at
Yeah but I meant with using laser rangefinder. Or ability to set time fuse distance without laser rangefinder (some vehicles have LWS)
Honestly we have tottally room for more MBT, but i would be ok with only 4 Leclercs for a while if the powercreep stop and they follow the meta with some unerf and new things that should be here.
The most needed things for France ground top tier is more (more than 0 i mean…) light tank/support/APC/IFV etc…
1 Like
S1+, S2+ they are not much of meaning to be added. Then we going to add every batch of Leopard 2 and T-80BVM into game? Not at all. We already see M1A1 HC coming with ‘tested’ soft-kill APS(I know they also fielded on Iraq but it is little bit different model) and M1A2 implemented in modelling with some ‘test’ for M1A2 SEP added. So unless there were significant difference on S1+ and S2+ I don’t think they will be added as seperate vehicle. And I can’t find significant difference of them on the bases of book ‘Char leclerc’ by M.P. Robinson I have.
For EAU and Tropiclaise same standard. EAU is just based on tropicalise… For Ares Bayard Carnot, Duroc, Estienne, they are basically single vehicle of prototype. Maybe one or two can be added in the future but it is not what players called as ‘top rank’ for sure.
T4/Terminator, same vehicle. Nothing technically changed.
So still, one or two from prototype, XLR, T4, EAU(or Tropicalise). Not big change in number. Gaijin will save their possible candidate for long time to prolong their game life span as far as possible.
I think using the Binoculars may circumvent the fuse setting, or lasing using the commanders sight (not always an option though) without aim mode on
1 Like
Let’s agree to disagree.
Ill make sure to see if thats true, thank you a lot.
Edit: tyyy so much it works.
I hope gaijin add new APFSDS top on 3 Leclerc and increase higher 11.7 BR this year
1 Like
Awesome! glad I could help :)
2 Likes
I know a lot of things that could be unerf/buff on Leclerc, but mainly hersay from tankers, so never gonna happen before decades and unclassified docs xD
Just saying, if Leclercs were modeled as IRL, they would be 13.0 in the game right now.
But even with proof things not gonna change, like gaijin have confirmed the 6s reloading is for balance.
1 Like
Norwegians used french low pressure 90mm’s (D/925), but used indigenous FCS, added a 50cal coax from surplus F-86 Sabres, and an upgraded powerpack (the Detroit 6V-53T, same as used in the Strv103). The modifications were done by a Norwegian company.
3 Likes
Which I think kinda makes it worse. I’d say tanks like the leclerc, CR2 etc. that are underperforming hard and are in need of a buff could simply and easily get an increased fire rate, but they won’t even do that just proves how little they actually care about top tier balance
2 Likes