just because you post the translation doesnt mean you should continue
Okay.
In all seriousness, I use this as an opportunity to communicate with native speakers and practice using it, not just for the hell of it.
One good devblog and we’ll blow through the 1700 comments needed to get to part three!
I thought we wouldn’t even get to part 3, but at this rate, we’ll easily get to part 4 and may even just get to part 5.
All it takes is one Alex, and we will get to part 6 in no time
Someone! Quick! Say something controversial.
France has too few vehicles to make up full trees and should be removed.
Su-57 is a well built vehicle. You can criticise procurement, but not the design.
OBJ 279 should go to 8.0 or 7.7. It is too weak where it is now
German players when all they get next major update is another Leopard variant with no hull armor
Benelux F-16 is better than UK MiG-29K? KF-41 is/isn’t German?
B*nelux mentioned
French subtree in German TT confirmed?
Russian subtree in Italy because of that one T-34 that Italy had.
Britain has enough light tanks in their tt. They don’t need as much attention as Swedish top tier with barely playable Strv122.
Gave me a good chuckle reading this
Polish F-16 and Iranian F-14 in USSR tech tree, when
Iranian F-14, captured F-5E, captured M109, why not. Since T-90A Trophy got leaked.
I mean they have Leo 2PL with the best thermals among all Leopard variants. Giving them armor would completely break the balance. Obv
I think a cretain blue yellow country should be a sub tt in a cretain while blue red country