Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

@Smin1080p Do you know anything about source credibility used in bug reports or there are other persons responsible for this?(That book used in 2s6 32g bug-report)

2s6 uses similar missiles to the pansir, pretty sure only the booster is different

well if you dont believe the sources just get some more that say otherwise lol, and if you dont trust what a gaijin official says what do you even believe

just for clarity, smin is british, he has no reason to claim russian sources as always credible

Would still be better then nothing. Japan has very good military development, but they’re also extremely limited in the depth of how much they can do.
They could otherwise maybe get 2 new light vehicles which would only be small improvements on the Type 87 and Type 16.

1 Like

Bug report and source used for it were specifically about 2s6(or at least that’s how I remembered it after reading the book)

@_Fantom2451

Yeah sadly their ground department is much slower when it comes to developments compared to the airforce and especially their naval department.

2 Likes

wow no way theres a su27 thread? thank god

They differ (not significantly in terms of aerodynamics). Just design is pretty same.

1 Like

So yea the only reason the F-2 isn’t going to be added soon is because of the Radar.

me waiting for Brazil to be added…
imagem_2023-12-03_133642585

4 Likes

Doesn’t the XF-2A solve that problem?

Not much reason to release it after f-16aj without AAM-3

?? I said it is the most realistic one. Where did you take the fake from?

When will we see the F-2? Gaijin: I’ll have a chance to see it when the Su-57 is added.

Because other nations (Russia) lack in AESA we decided that the best solution would be to implement the Su-57 in order to test the characteristics of the radar type, other vehicles will be coming eventually (never).

1 Like

The scary part it might be true - we won’t see anything advanced without imaginary soviet tech

Sorry, whats fake about others?

Can you please expande on that? Would love to hear it. And if you will say Mi-28A and T-80U, then yeah, it is BS, but what else?

If I had to guess its the fact they have better protected Leopard 2s while also having Leopard 2A6.