Yep, that shit went waaay out of control.
alright, who opens that topic?
call it Anonymous British mains
1 Like
Good
Main theme of the update doesn’t deny major stuff for other categories.
Main theme of sons of attila was hungary, yet they also added the arguably more hyped F-16C/D and MiG-29SMT that update.
Main theme of supersonic was rank VI aircraft, yet they also added the entire italian ground tree that update.
Main theme of starfighters was the F-104s, yet they also added the italian naval tree that update.
A discussion going way out of control is not good, it’s never good.
ETPS is owned and operated bt QinetiQ. Their jets are privately owned jets. They are military contractors. They are allowed on RAF bases because of their work. They are not a part of the RAF or owned by the RAF. They are contracted and in agreement with the MoD. That’s it.
1 Like
It be like saying the raf files som f/a18 so they should get them
The ETPS Gripen D additionally is kept and maintained in Sweden at SAABs facility, they don’t keep it around at the ETPS
Plus it isn’t used for combat training either, rather for test pilot training and research puposes
2 Likes
There is literally 0 place in game for private companies. It would be insanely jarring to start seeing actual brand name company jets in War Thunder. It has no place.
Also again - You’re asking for the impossible. ETPS’ Gripen has no weaponry, no systems for firing missiles or anything. Its a training jet. For training.
That’s it.
1 Like
ain’t that more like a was?
So SAAF gripen D
1 Like
SAAF have Gripen C so far as i’m aware
every time I read SAAF I think it means South Australian Airforce
3 Likes
Depends on how one looks at things
Alot more capable than mig 23 is
MiG-23 has All aspect missiles tho
And D
And my Fgr2 can’t :(
2 Likes
You mean one flare and they die
at least they lock