Im again unsure what a prototype has to do with this. Premiums dont have to be prototypes, many of them are not. A prototype Q-5 would be closer to the Q-5 early and not at the range the Q-5D is being added to fill a gap for in the premium roster of vehicle choices.
The “marketing department” has nothing to do with the section of premium vehicles like the Q-5D or vehicles in general. They market the game. Again, im unsure of the relevance to the question here
Probably not coming to the IA as a way to appease the america mains, similarly to how mavericks were excluded from the I even after better engines got added to the E
F-15EX based on QA, it has MAW, but the actual system itself taken out but as I understand it could always be put back.
TLDR technical compatibility for both to get MAW via F-15QA being identical to both based on in game configurations*
*
Israeli F-15IA being a bit iffy considering it’s a F-15EX copy based on a render, but still
Looks like a primarily air to air IR missile (exceptions being the R-2xR missiles, based on the tweet) rework, but maybe it includes it as well (you know, because next gen/new missiles might be introduced next update)
Let’s use the planes of the same country alongside the tanks of the same country in arcade-style tank battles. It should not be used with vehicles from different countries. For example; Italian tanks and Italian aircraft. And in order to use them; let’s acquire those aircraft…
Why is Gaijin releasing the Q-5D with a loadout that ONLY encourages base bombing? We already have the A-5C which is a good multirole aircraft (although egregiously overtiered…)
All the Q-5D is going to do, is create more competition for bases. The A-5C already fills any role the Q-5D would have.
