Next Major Update - "Eagle's Shadow" Rumour Roundup & Discussion (Part 2)

I do not. If you believe something may be wrong, please report it.

Until we get there, its impossible to say currently.

Back in the respective dev server it was added alongside M-346.

Not for it, alongside. But M-346 documents state the bomb is integrable

Not all tanks have them currently. Any missing can be reported with evidence.

Makes no logical sense to remove it from the planned aircraft and not just give it to the compatible one

Are developers allowed to use controlled documents?

even more so because its a controlled document about a different but related plane

so even if it wasnt controlled it wouldnt be admissible as a source for bug reports

1 Like

??? Surely that’s just unnecessary strain when all modern MBTs have some form of lighting for road maneuvers in a peacetime environment, also can just be added based off a quick glance at the visual model

If/when Smin says no, then what would be your next question?

well im sure @Kobes-Kamov can get on that if/when hes got the time im not good at making reports :)

i will agree it does seem a tad unnecessary but its whatever

It seems the F-15IA could potentially use the GBU-53 due to technical compatibility—what do you think?
I think the armaments for the EX and IA should be more or less the same, but…

1 Like

Is this only for semi modern vehicles or are WW2 vehicles allowed to be reported?

Looks like Audace is in her own line.

Later I expect the line to have Impetuoso (in game), Impavido (5.3) and san giorgio (5.0) too

I guess they did not want to sneak a destroyer after regia marina 135mm cruisers

in that case, there is a iris-t report you might want to take a look at, as far as we are aware restricted material was used in it.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/rT0hobecEElw

Alright, glad to hear that. Thank you

To be honest, this always read (to me, anyways) as a general restriction to us not sharing restricted material (which, fair, and tbh, common sense) anywhere.

But it doesn’t address his core question: it stops us from sharing, but nowhere does it state you (developers) can’t/are restricted from using info from restricted materials internally.

Doesn’t matter even if they remove it

They are still going to use the document lmao 🤷‍♀️

As we have stated numerous times.

2 Likes