I know, but @Smin1080p_WT Always comes with an anwer to why its not being added.
But it’s compatible, and that is the excuse gaijin used to give all the AH-64Es DIRCM even though the US is the only country to actually be using it
EX prototype had it, which is far more real than the total fantasy SM2 we have ingame
2 Likes
But isreali EX doesn’t exist. Whatever F-15IA would be, isn’t gonna exist for few years and we don’t know what changes they have made
Yep, even more so, when it was already happening, after it was talked about in the CM post.
But it doesn’t matter as if it shares anything with something in-game and is in a spot as a possible French vehicle; it’s C&P, as all 3 Benelux nations can only get a vehicle once every 10 years by the French.
So it doesn’t matter how changed it is, to the point that people call an F-5A variant a C&P of the F-5E when it’s not related to it at all.
1 Like
not even 1 ground vehicle tho?
Do we know if it’s gonna be a copy of F-15EX or different? Because if it’s identical then it’s just another F-16AJ, so it’s fine
Such a disappointment, japan still lack a toptier 15.0 vehicle , but they rather add f15-ex to the Israeli even if they did not receive a single plane
I am going to watch russian dev stream with 10 hours Duolingo russian under my belt. Snail help me
1 Like
By that logic, the US status of the aircraft should be used as the baseline, and foreign operators can build from there VIA specified orders
It will be better because it gets MAWS
So why does the german leo not have LWS and ODAEON
1 Like
Japan’s F-15 modernisation is even further away from reality than the IA
I mean Boeings own F-15EX are equipped with MAWS, so it could use it, though i would try to find documents, besides I don’t see any justification or documents or proof shown for technical compatibly of LDIRCM for AH-64E for other nations
It’s included in some of the Boeing renders, but regardless the F-15IA only has MAWS on the visual model on the dev stream, in the stream you can see it’s not added
1 Like
As it was always meant to be
Heavy two seat multirole fighter its not argulable. Just check the thrust-weight ratio. It can be an air superiority with (lower fuel +amraams loadout). For air-to-air the counterpart of the F15EX is the Su 35s, not the Su30sm2 (acceleration at high speed,Energy management). U are the biased not me, as I said I have both (USA and USSR) top tier.
1 Like
That’s the neat part: no one knows
1 Like
Alright, there are some advanced eagles in service with MAW iirc so it looks like there’s nothing paper about it at least
5 Likes