??? Surely that’s just unnecessary strain when all modern MBTs have some form of lighting for road maneuvers in a peacetime environment, also can just be added based off a quick glance at the visual model
If/when Smin says no, then what would be your next question?
i will agree it does seem a tad unnecessary but its whatever
It seems the F-15IA could potentially use the GBU-53 due to technical compatibility—what do you think?
I think the armaments for the EX and IA should be more or less the same, but…
1 Like
Is this only for semi modern vehicles or are WW2 vehicles allowed to be reported?
Looks like Audace is in her own line.
Later I expect the line to have Impetuoso (in game), Impavido (5.3) and san giorgio (5.0) too
I guess they did not want to sneak a destroyer after regia marina 135mm cruisers
in that case, there is a iris-t report you might want to take a look at, as far as we are aware restricted material was used in it.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/rT0hobecEElw
Alright, glad to hear that. Thank you
To be honest, this always read (to me, anyways) as a general restriction to us not sharing restricted material (which, fair, and tbh, common sense) anywhere.
But it doesn’t address his core question: it stops us from sharing, but nowhere does it state you (developers) can’t/are restricted from using info from restricted materials internally.
Doesn’t matter even if they remove it
They are still going to use the document lmao 🤷♀️
As we have stated numerous times.
2 Likes
So far we have had no evidence to suggest its restricted. But will continue to review its credibility and origin.
That’s all for this major new vehicle wise.
Hey Smin off topic but is there any further information on this report for the German t34s and it’s ammo
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/mcu1Ou9WbLmd
No changes so far.
Unfortunate hopefully it’ll change soon
is there any changes on this report?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nHVBhbcSQiyC