@Alpharius11348
Granted, War Thunder currently doesn’t allow for separate ammo storage, so even if it was reported there’s nothing Gaijin could do until that’s fixed.
Then OTOMATIC gets impacted as well, though both negatively and positively in its case.
Proper double feed mechanism simulation, as well as separate ammo storage in the game’s code would be a first for these games.
@Scyobi_Empire-psn
NATO tanks already had it.
they could do what the already did, and slightly increase the reload time to account for this (why it was 6.5 seconds before)
I don’t mind the change assuming it’s accurate, but still annoys the shit out of me that they get it as standard while manually loaded ones has to go trough the massive grind of getting aced crew
All right you experts !!! Than please go on all Leo’s on 5,0 at least 5,5 sec. It is proven that a well educated crew does not need 6 sec (gold crew) for reloading. And not just once !
And why should now the autoloaders of USR and CHN must be update ?? After at least a year ??? It does not make any sense.
So if the USSR T80s and T72s are all buffed (okay … plus chinese), then it is only fair to update all Leo’s. >>> But you know what ?? I won’t happen.
You think i am crying ???
Be happy that the ammo compartment of all T80s and T72s does not explode as it should. Bug tickets with perfect evidence is still open and not even a response on that.
And anyway how is possible that BVM side armour stops 650mm. And it is written that it chemical protection and not kinetic … but what do i know, things which no one cares about, just crying.
Leaks, so I’m taking them with a grain of salt
but seriously
why would the BVM get a reload buff when the T-90M/72B3 and ZTZ99s need it far more
You can have a few crews have max reload by Rank V easily
Not having them by top tier is entirely on you
They’re standard reloads for the AZ and MZ autoloaders
Bro forgot about SLM
Why is this, just for curiosity’s sake? and how would that work? would it make it so that you can’t carry mostly 3bm60, and you need to space it out with something else? would it then have to carry more ATGM or HE? or maybe space it out with other APFSDS that isn’t 3bm60?
I dont remember why, probably has to due with the length though
yes it would mean you should be limited to less than half your carousel of 3bm60 and any more than that going in the other ammo storage around the tank
Two years ago or earlier, NATO’s 120mm manual loading was the ace 6.0s, expert 6.4s, while the T80 series remained constant at 6.5s - considering the advantages of automatic loaders, this is a very reasonable “balanced” data. However, currently only the Leopard 2 series of NATO 120mm manual loading remains at 6.0s, while the rest have been adjusted to 5.0s… Even for balance, it is a rather unbalanced option because the lower level T64 series will face the expert 7.1s and the ace 6.7s NATO 105mm manual loading! 6s vs 7.1s？ Is it the same balance method to adjust the lower level T72a/M1 to 7.0s? Why aren’t the higher level T72/T90 adjusted? Why did the ZTZ96/99 series only reduce by 0.1s?
Makes sense
Would this mean that they’d have to use 2 types of APFSDS? I mean, apparently they currently aren’t getting many 3bm60 at all so I guess this isn’t a huge issue currently.
it would mean they can only have 11 3bm60 in the carousel, but theres no reason they cant just have empty spaces and bring more than that in the other ammo storage around the hull
of course it would make them more likely to be ammo racked because more ammo scattered around
Yeah I just meant that tanks in active service atm apparently aren’t getting access to 3bm60
iirc some has been seen, but yeah mostly using older darts
and IRL tanks tend to bring more HEAT and HE than darts so its not really an issue
Is there any reason why only VT4 could get buff from 7.1s – 6.66s?
So according to you, Soviet vehicle should be outright overpowered in every part? Why not just hand them a one-tap " Win’ button and be done with it?🤣 And you have the nerve to mention the VT4’s armor? Don’t make me laugh. It’s practically paper-thin! Let’s see how much you "love’ Chinese tanks when you’re stuck with their glorious upcoming 7-second reload time. Enjoy your ‘advantage’ in mobility between those long waits!🤣
What “overpowered” would that be lmao?
YES. this is actually good news. We’ll get accurate autoloaders
Hopefully gaijin changes the 7s reload to 6.5 tho
Ok then add loader fatigue